3 points
*

I hope that ad blocking features are eventually seen as a killer feature, driving Firefox market shares up at the expense of “you can’t even block a fucking ad!” Chrome-based browsers.

If that’s gonna happen or not, I have no idea. It depends on how well each side plays its cards. The worst case scenario is Google boiling frogs (i.e. removing capabilities little by little) while Mozilla fails to advertise Firefox in this regard.

permalink
report
reply

Seems like Firefox has already started the marketing campaign targeting this aspect of things. Just be sure to implement a User Agent Spoofer so FF can get around issues revolving around not being chromium based ie specific aspects of webpages tend to be designed only for chromium based browsers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

What sucks (IMO) about having to use Agent Spoofers is that it seems like a positive feedback loop for sites to keep making stuff based on Chromium. If traffic metrics basically all show up as Chromium, then they would see less reasons to bother being usable by Firefox or even Safari. Kind of like when the top brass of a company are surrounded by “yes men”. But I know it isn’t quite that level of bad atm. Though ad companies would more than likely rather deal with working with Google as opposed to allowing Firefox users to keep blocking things.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Browser made by an advertising company doesn’t like ad blockers. Gif at eleven.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

In fairness, FF will also upgrade to support Manifest V3. The difference is that it will also keep support for V2.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I know. A wise decision imo.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 912

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments

Community moderators