5 points

I feel like the news is in the details here, that non-biologists won’t really understand or appreciate. Because as far as I know it’s not news that small mammals co-existed with dinosaurs.

I distinctly remember learning (as a kid) that mammals survived it because they were small, could breed often, and produced lots of offspring… so they could evolutionally adapt quickly.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Not precisely humans but the ancient placental mammal lineage that includes humans, dogs, and bats.

Obviously. That’s how evolution works. Everything alive today had an “ancestor” alive at the time of the dinosaurs, and before the time of the dinosaurs.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I guess the Flintstones predicted this one…

permalink
report
reply
2 points

This is just true by definition of the word “ancestor”

permalink
report
reply
2 points

”Not precisely humans but the ancient placental mammal lineage that includes humans, dogs, and bats.”

In one documentary, these mammals were depicted as four legged rat sized animals. Not something I would call humans, but I guess writers need to make living too.

permalink
report
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments