This is not a review. This is a warning. If I gave Francis Ford Coppola’s “Megalopolis” a standard movie review and told you that it was an incoherent mess on par with “Rebel Moon” (which it is), your fanboy reflexes would kick and you’d write me off. You’d take me as just another pair of glasses dead set on panning a movie just to bolster their art cred. I hate critics like that, and so do you.

So I’m telling you this not as a reviewer, but as a friend: Do not see this movie. It is a piece of s—t.

23 points

I don’t think they liked it.

Is it wrong that this kinda makes me want to watch it more?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It’s definitely intriguing

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not wrong! Gotta love a hot mess sometimes 😄😆

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m absolutely all in. Rebel Moon is great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

For those of us who grew up as fans of Coppola’s work, the point isn’t to go watch a movie that is good. It’s to go experience the final work of a man who changed cinema, who was part of the New Hollywood group that challenged the studio system and broke conventions.

This man skirted the line between art house and commercialism for over 50 years while saying fuck you to the status quo. So if he’s going out with a beautiful abstract mess because that’s how he wants to spend his money, screw it I’ll buy a ticket to watch the old man’s final show.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Is it a beautiful abstract mess in the same vein as The Tree of Life by Terrence Malik, or Under the Skin by Jonathan Glazer? Because if it is, I think I’ll skip it. To each his/her/their own!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lol I love/hate The Tree of Life. If it goes in that direction I’ll have to watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No idea, but I hate/hate the tree of life. If you do go watch it and you love/hate it, let me know so I know to avoid it lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but that writer sucks at his job. That was just a pointless rant for the majority of the page.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying a movie critic is required to use formal writing rules. But when it’s that sloppy and over dramatic, it puts his opinion of the movie in doubt because anyone that sloppy likely won’t have the ability to grasp any dialogue complexity.

That piece would be fine on reddit or lemmy. But on a site like that? Nah, whoever is the equivalent of editor there failed hard by letting that one through.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Incredibly polarizing movies like this fascinate me, it’s on my must watch list for this weekend.

50% on Rotten Tomatoes:

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/megalopolis

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I’m so fucking grateful you didn’t put the fucking word shit in the headline

permalink
report
reply
3 points

We dodged a bullet there.

permalink
report
parent
reply

movies

!movies@lemm.ee

Create post

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have “English” selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

  • Discussion threads to discuss about a specific movie or show
  • Weekly threads: what have you been watching lately?
  • Trailers
  • Posters
  • Retrospectives
  • Should I watch?

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

Community stats

  • 3.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments