Israel’s announcement on Thursday of the killing of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar in Gaza has seemingly fuelled the US with new energy to pursue a stalled ceasefire agreement, but it faces a short window of opportunity and an emboldened ally as it looks to revive a deal.

The Biden administration’s reluctance to use any leverage against Israel for a ceasefire has brought into question the administration’s sincerity in wanting an end to the war on Gaza. It has also dulled perceptions of Washington’s ability to influence events as escalations between Israel and Iran, and Israel’s invasion of Lebanon, bring the region to the brink of an all-out war.

“To a certain extent, the US shares Israel’s interests and objectives and has been using flowery human rights rhetoric and ‘ceasefire talks’ as a way of distracting all parties involved and buying Israel time to carry out its genocide in Gaza, strike heavy blows against its regional adversaries, and re-establish the status quo through brute force.”

Matt Duss, executive vice president at the Center for International Policy, said the US is being drawn into a war that imperils its personnel and the region, and stopping it "rests on whether President Biden is finally willing to take the steps necessary – including suspending offensive weapons deliveries – to prevent a horrific conflagration.”

15 points

Israel is blatantly turning northern Gaza into a death camp, and has killed the THIRD person they were negotiating with in recent months.

Why the fuck would you negotiate with a bloodthirsty ghoul like that?

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

Who else should they negotiate with? He was apparently their top dawg regarding both their military as well as the hostages

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The bloodthirsty ghoul I was referring to is Netanyahu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yeah they misunderstood your question on purpose

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

They’d just replace him with someone worse.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

they’ll replace the head with another dead guy

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Huh? Revive? I mean it’s Middle Eastern Eye so they’re at least not parroting US propaganda but how the fuck does that make sense?

Edit: I see now (should’ve probably read the article from the start). It’s more the US “trying” for peace talks than any real progress.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

IDK man, it doesn’t seem to be about Hamas…

permalink
report
reply
27 points

How does more violence help peace talks when the other side still has a war criminal in charge?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Yeah, they literally killed the guy they were directly negotiating with, nobody’s going to want to be the next one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly; they’ve killed the guy who was actually talking to them; do they expect the next person to be more cooperative?

No, they just want more excuses to kill civilians

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

They’ve killed the Hamas negotiator twice and the Hezbollah negotiator once, so 3 times so far

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 283K

    Comments