Politico

132 points

I don’t know how anyone can genuinely believe that Republicans are for small government and say the competition is good when they’re using government to stifle competition.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

If you know nothing you’ll believe anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Follow that with "Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities”… and you start to get a feel for the playbook the GOP is using

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s truly amazing how stupid they can be though. It probably exceeded all of our expectations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

These backward-ass clowns are going to be the bane of this world.

permalink
report
reply
46 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

In my ideal world, we’d have a full carbon tax as well as a vehicle weight tax, and we’d use part of that to fund more electrified public transit (e.g., trains, trams, trolleybuses) and bike infrastructure. Plus we need to actually legalize dense, walkable urbanism. The zoning codes and parking minimums in North America make it literally illegal to build anything dense, walkable, and transit-oriented across almost all the urban land, resulting in miles and miles of government-mandated sprawl.

The future of sustainable urban is truly in public transit and micromobility – car dependency just doesn’t make any sense in cities, as no amount of electric cars can make up for the harm caused by sprawling, car-dependent land use. Electric cars are obviously less bad than ICE cars, but just swapping out ICE cars for electric is not actually financially, socially, or environmentally sustainable.

We should still have electric cars for the use cases (e.g., rural areas) for which you truly do need them, but the vehicle weight arms race (especially for trucks and SUVs) is getting out of control and we need the electric cars we would still have to be much smaller and lighter like this. Fewer electric hummers, more electric kei trucks, more electric trains, more electric bikes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/OUNXFHpUhu8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

It shouldn’t be double but we all need to pay for the roads.

only double would be a welcome change in the state of Ohio.

  • Car cost = $31/year
  • Truck (non commercial)=$46/year to $80/year
  • Hybrid car = $131/year
  • EV car = $231 year
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

AFAIK even the heaviest tesla car has basically nothing on what a semi does to a road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean yeah, obviously, but it isn’t a particularly useful comparison since the two aren’t really alternatives to each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

A thousand Tesla’s don’t do as much damage as the daily 3 axle loaded up dump trucks with no registration driving back and forth all day long.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Charge road use taxes by vehicle weight. Yes, electric cars are heavy, but so is the average American vehicle, because people seem to love their enormous trucks. If you have a Model 3 or a roadster, it’s actually lighter than the average.

According to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the average weight of a car is around 4094 pounds. A small car weighs around 2600 pounds, while a large car weighs around 4400 pounds.

  • Tesla Model X Plaid - 5,390 pounds
  • Tesla Model X Standard Range - 5,185 pounds
  • Tesla Model S Plaid - 4,766 pounds
  • Tesla Model S Long Range - 4,561 pounds
  • Tesla Model Y Long Range & Performance - 4,416 pounds
  • Tesla Model 3 Long Range & Performance - 4,065 pounds
  • Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus - 3,582 pounds
  • Tesla Roadster - 2,723 pounds
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

You’ve got it right, but let me expand with the power of mathematical modelling. The average vehicle is, for the last 20 years or so, pegged at 4000 lbs when doing road damage calculations. A Chevy bolt EV is around 3800 lbs, or smaller than average, while Tesla vehicles are like you said. The fourth power law is what is used to estimate road damage, and the take away point from that is that all vehicles in and around that 4000 lb range and nothing, notta, moot, compared to large trucks and shipping rigs.

As an example. Take the bolt EV at 3800 lbs, the F150 at 4200 lbs, and the F350 at 6764 lbs.

The bolt and f150 would have 1900lbs and 2100lbs per axle respectively. Applying the fourth power rule the F150 does (2100/1900)^4= 1.49 times the damage of a Bolt EV. Meanwhile the F350 does , (3382/1900)^4 = 10 times the road damage.

So then, is it true that the F150 and F350 will be made to pay 1.5 and 10 times the registration and fuel taxes of an EV like the Bolt? I have not yet seen this to be true. Now imagine how much damage a delivery van, or large shipping vehicle does.

The other part of this is environmental damage, are these states going to find a way to charge for carbon emissions proportionally from the gas vehicles? Of course not.

In Canada anyway fuel taxes go into general revenue, not to roads, that’s a whole different line of argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

With safety regulations, I thought smaller cars are around 2800-3000lbs now. A 7 year old (2016) Mazda 3 (compact car) is showing as 2900lbs. When you say small are you talking like the sub compact cars? Just trying to get an idea of what small means in this instance.

https://www.edmunds.com/mazda/3/2016/sedan/features-specs/

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They could just take the money from fossil fuel subsidies. This way, you don’t give people a new reason to not get an EV and we reduce tax revenue used to support the fossil fuel industry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That would have to be one huge payment, though. I can only think of a few cases in my entire life that I’ve bought a tire.

Seems better to me that they collect the taxes from everyone from the income tax and/or business taxes. Everyone uses the roads, even if they don’t have a car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I would have gone with backward ass-clowns, but both are good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

These backward-ass clowns are going to be the bane of this world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Ah you think downvotes are your ally? You merely adopted the downvotes. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn’t see the upvotes until I was already a boomer, by then it was nothing to me but turmoil!

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

“This law was bought for you by Big Oil and the Koch Brothers”

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Gooch is clearly a shill in their pockets

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

“We’re moving so fast to electric vehicles, we’re just making the problems worse,” said state Rep. Jim Gooch ®, the longtime chair of Kentucky’s House energy committee. Those problems are multiplying, he added, as public officials look to electrify government fleets — especially transit systems and school districts.

“I certainly don’t want to put my kids on a school bus that’s electric. I just don’t want to do it,” Gooch said. “And I’ll fight in any way I can to make sure that that’s not something Kentucky’s doing.”

What? Why would you not want your kids going on a bus that has zero exhaust? School busses that use diesel straight smell like crap and it’s absolutely hot af in the south. After reading this quote I was like, this world is so fucked.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Conservatism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s just so backwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Fear of change, while the world is constantly changing. It’s regressive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

He said he just doesn’t want to, ok?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A vehicle powered by electricity alone? Well it just ain’t right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Kentucky

That explains everything

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In the city where I live, almost all public transport buses are electric. Honestly for a bus it’s so much better than diesel, they’re quiet, don’t vibrate and ride much smoother

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They can also leverage regen due to constant stopping, don’t get high drag penalty due to low speeds, etc. seems like good application for EV. Makes no sense as you said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There’s a guy who is definitely has a hoard of incandesant light bulbs in his garage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To add to that, does anyone here remember those bus fire drills that you had to do once a year?

I remember having to walk a quarter mile away from the propane buses in case they blew. Much more boomy than the diesel or gasoline buses which would only burn you to death!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ll tell you why; because oil lobbyists paid him to be against EVs and he has no actual reason to be against EVs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He’s a conservative. He wants to conserve his oil lobbyists payout.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Fuck this shit, but also did anyone else do a double take when they read this?

“It’s a barrier to adoption,” said Albert Gore, executive director of the Zero Emission Transportation Association, a trade group.

I had to look him up.

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

Oh no sir, I must say you’re wrong. I’m Gal Bore, absolutely no relation whatsoever to the very handsome former vice president.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 414K

    Comments