Trimbath keeps banging the drums on FTD’s but GME has very little FTD’s going on. I do think FTD’s are a big problem and they should carry consequences but I don’t think it’s the biggest problem.

The biggest problem, and the one most relevant to GME, is infinite liquidity.

If there is infinite liquidity, then shorts can buy to close, and then immediately short two or three times more and walk away with even more money. Why FTD when you can roll over your shorts, and just keep piling them on?

When it’s time to close those shorts, you close them and short sell twice over again.

Then when it’s time to close those shorts, you close them and short sell twice over again.

And then when it’s time to close those shorts, you close them and short sell twice over again.

Repeat, repeat, repeat.

This is how Citadel Securities traded over 964 million shares of GME over the past 3 years.

https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/15t09n7/the_gme_otc_conspiracy_presenting_over_3_years_of/

Someone should ask Trimbath what she thinks about infinite liquidity on the stock market, and if the DTCC should be audited?

The only person authorized to issue new shares is the company whose shares are being traded. The DTCC can not issue new shares.

In the face of infinite liquidity, arguing over FTD’s is like being worried you left your oven on when your house is on fire.

2 points

The only way this can crash is if we can prove there aren’t any more shares. When all shares are accountable outside the DTCC it’s over, no matter what.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

This is why our stock keeps crabbing downhill.

It rises a little, and then gradually fades away.

That is short sellers buying to close and then short selling x2

Infinite liquidity causes stock dilution, which is theft.

Audit the DTCC.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Infinite liquidity is just a fancy term for counterfeiting

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

All these people saying “that’s just FTD’s” or “you’re just describing FTD’s” no I’m not. You’re not understanding the consequences of infinite liquidity.

Let me ask you this. How can short volume be over 50% for years on end?

How can GME’s FTD data show so few FTD’s, for years on end?

Both of the above are true. But that’s only possible when there is a lot more short selling than shares being purchased at market by investors.

Meaning apes have limited buying power, but hedge funds have unlimited short selling power.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Don’t know why I’m being downvoted here. Please check out the reddit thread too.

https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/15u5vd3/what_if_ftds_arent_the_real_issue/

permalink
report
reply
6 points

To extrapolate further consequences from infinite liquidity:

options are useless. Any attempt to move the price by gamma squeeze just gets washed out with a larger amount of short selling. It’s possible the hedge funds were taken by surprise in January 2021, but they’re watching closely now and they won’t let it happen again.

TA is useless. Sure we can look at short volume and options data and draw lines on a whiteboard. But any time we predict a MOASS they will just short sell more on that date and there won’t be a MOASS.

How to MOASS? Audit the DTCC. The only way we win is if there is a short selling ban on GME. The ban would have to last for years and force all short sales to close without any opportunity to roll over the short by just shorting more.

permalink
report
reply

WhyDRS

!whydrs@lemmy.whynotdrs.org

Create post

Community to discuss the WhyDRS.org project and resources, and how to spread DRS advocacy and information to all investors for all securities.

Have a great idea to spread the word? There are some resources here to get started!

https://www.whydrs.org/free-resources

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 78

    Posts

  • 218

    Comments

Community moderators