Hello just making a poll, which one do you prefer? personally I prefer x265 but since the rarbg falldown i’ve seen that almost all 1080p rips are in x264, what do you think about that, and do you recommend any place to find more x265 content beside those in the megathread?

17 points

x265. I do my own rips usually.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Do you use handbreak to do it? And what settings? Is it something that needs to be played around with to see how output is, so doing small segment to determine what is ideal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

No, I use Simple x264/x265 encoder in combo with MeGUI (do the avs in MeGUI, the encode on Simple x264/x265 encoder).

Yeah, you have to play around with it to see what quality suits you. And yes, that takes a looooot of time. Doing small segments will give you a general idea, but the end result may greatly differ in movies with a lot of fast moving action scenes. So, it’s best to just encode the whole thing (2 pass, I use the very slow preset, but I’m nuts), view the results and just go from there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m a bit of a layman in regard to video codecs, what’s the actual difference?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

So basically, quality can differ across them but most of the time you’re gonna be happy with how it looks. But where it makes a bigger difference is file sizes. That’s the main reason why I care

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

H264 then encode to h265 manually

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Unless you’re specifically grabbing those high bitrate archival copies you really shouldn’t be re-encoding from one lossy codec to another lossy codec.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

transcoding is certianly not ideal, but some releases have obscenely high bitrates and if you’re more concerned about archival than max fidelity reducing size by a factor of 5-10x (h264->av1) is worth it for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s hard to get to know if encode is good encode :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are you getting the highest bitrate release you can before re-encoding? You can only make the quality worse by re-encoding. It’s just the way lossy compression works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

i have always wondered the difference between the two encodings (beyond the obvious filesize). thanks!

i am also still lamenting the shutdown of RARBG. :(

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Both allow for various degrees of parametrization between compression rate, quality, and performance. HEVC/H.265/x265 is just better at it - it allows for better compression at the same quality. Same for 10 bit. Same for AV1.

If you want maximum compatibility to players/playback you take 8 bit AVC/H.264/x264.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I prefer 265 for efficiency BUT there’s a certain nostalgic warmth with 264 over-compressed fuzz. Same deal as with vinyl records. It was such an improvement on xvid back in the day…

permalink
report
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others


Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.


Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 84K

    Comments