Explosive new audio reveals that Donald Trump detailed how he really felt about his White House staff to Jeffrey Epstein, and Epstein touted old photos of Trump with half-naked women taken at the site of the pedophile’s rampant sexual abuse of young girls.

On author Michael Wolff’s Thursday episode of his podcast Fire and Fury, Wolff shared a recording of a conversation with Epstein from 2017, in which the convicted sex offender and alleged human trafficker recounted Trump’s true feelings about members of his administration, The Daily Beast reported.

“His people fight each other and then have outsiders—he sort of poisons the well outside,” Epstein told Wolff. Epstein went on to paraphrase Trump’s candid statements about his former strategist Steve Bannon, former chief of staff Reince Priebus, and counselor Kellyanne Conway.

“He will tell 10 people, ‘Bannon’s a scumbag’ and ‘Priebus is not doing a good job’ and ‘Kelly has a big mouth’—what do you think? ‘Jamie Dimon says that you’re a problem and I shouldn’t keep you. And I spoke to Carl Icahn. And Carl thinks I need a new spokesperson,’” Epstein said.

“‘So Kelly[anne]—even though I hired Kellyanne’s husband—Kellyanne is just too much of a wildcard.’ And then he tells Bannon, ‘You know I really want to keep you, but Kellyanne hates you,’” Epstein continued.

Wolff said that he had recordings of roughly “100 hours of Epstein talking about the inner workings of the Trump White House and about his long standing, deep relationship with Donald Trump

113 points

“And in some of the pictures, they’re sitting in his lap,” Wolff said. “I mean, and, and then there’s one I especially remember where there’s a stain, a telltale stain and on the front of Trump’s pants, and the girls are pointing at him and laughing.”

permalink
report
reply
47 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I’m saying. I have so many questions to ask, but I don’t want any of that knowledge burned into my brain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
41 points

Holy shit, this shit really came out 15 years ago? I remember when it first came out, it still holds up, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Congrats grandpa, you’re old now!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

N…no it coulldn’t have been 15 years. No… no, no, no!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hey, that was nice.

Also, unrelatedly: When did it become normal for old music videos to be swapped with blurry AI-upscaled versions? So distracting once you see it…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think it’s YouTube.

Unrelated: are you really actually frankenstein?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s probably youtube video compression being youtube video compression. Even at higher resolutions it’s always a little blurry

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Chef’s kiss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

Where are the recordings

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Exactly, I’m not doubting they exist, but if they have them, they need released publicly, like, now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Release! The! Tapes!

Come on, do it. It could have a real impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh my god, you just got out of your time machine from 2016, didn’t you??? That’s so cool! So anyway, to catch you up…

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Daily beast published the referenced samples on YouTube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I looked, and it’s a whole 1:12 of the alleged 100:00:00. That’s not enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

It absolutely won’t matter to a single one of his supporters.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Which is mine blowing because they talk so much about the Epstein list, because they believe it confirms their belief about corrupt elites, but then totally reject that the most likely guilty one is trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

Wolff claimed the FBI discovered the photos in Epstein’s safe when the agency raided his home in 2019, but never released the images to the public.

Exsqueeze me?

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Ok, fine, they didn’t release them.

Who the fuck decided not to release them?!?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Someone who was on them, in all likelihood.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Remember Julian Assange, Ed Snowden, or Chelsea Manning?

Public turned on whistleblowers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I mean…this is the FBI we are talking about. Anyone the least bit surprised?

This is the outfit that kneecapped Hillary on purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What were they supposed to do? Release nude pictures of abused minors to the public? Or transfer them to the team performing the investigation? Going to say people should have been more vocal about their existence, but discussing ongoing investigations is often considered wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Somebody should make a FOIA request for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It would be declined. 100% guaranteed.

Source: I’ve made countless FOIA requests. Federal agencies decline the most innocuous requests for the least valid of reasons. Something important like this would be declined instantly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wait, so information is not in fact “free”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

They were pictures of victims topless to be fair. Additionally it’s not clear to me that they are over 18.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Fair point. So edit them out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

He could admit to raping little children and his base would just say these children were blessed by his dick

permalink
report
reply
5 points

“But the child rapist would never rape my children!”

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments