Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin rocket tests in Texas are emitting so much methane you can see it from space::So much you can see it from the ISS in space.

124 points

When burned, methane produces water and carbon dioxide, which are less harmful to the environment. The issue here is not with rocket testing, but with improper storage of methane

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Always knew bezos was a cheap skeet. Can’t even properly pay his employees. So why should he make proper rockets. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s embarrassing because it sounds that all blue origin had to do was burn the excess methane to mitigate the impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is leaking methane

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

I’m sure rockets testing is a issue on its own, especially when we are facing a climate and social crisis and it’s being used for rich people entertainment or for aid authoritarian governments in shipping weapons into orbit

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
88 points

billionaires existing should be illegal

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Trickle down pollution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

If BO is being that careless with methane emissions then they are breaking laws. Report them

permalink
report
reply
7 points

BO used to mean body odour and this sentence still makes sense in France

permalink
report
parent
reply

The environmental agencies are corrupt pieces of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

Fun notes from America’s other privately owned, publicly funded space program. Even if you think that privatization of space is a good thing (you’re wrong, it’s not, but let’s just assume for the sake of argument that it is) how do you justify the fact that the public takes on huge swaths of the development cost, then has to pay to use the service, then has to pay to clean up externalities like an ocean of methane in the atmosphere?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I would say purely “because it works”. SpaceX has received a ton of funding, for sure. But they’ve delivered incredible advancements in reusable rocketry, methalox fuel cycles, cost to orbit and much more, while SLS was literally a flying scrap pile that was late and over budget despite being reused 1980s tech.

Let’s not pretend that NASA rockets were really public work either, with most of the development and construction done by contractors like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Aerojet Rocketdyne and more… But these old guard companies were happy to keep turning out the same old product with incremental improvements.

SpaceX could have been a tremendous failure or success with the risks they’ve taken, and we’re all lucky it turned out to be a success (so far…). It says it all when they are going to launch Orion on SLS but Starship is going to be waiting there at the moon for them. Well, if it doesn’t blow up on the pad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The space program of every nation have always worked that way. Even the Soviets were using Rhode Schwarz made gyroscopes. The Apollo rockets were built by the private sector.

The only real difference now is the ferrying contracts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Because public programs were somehow even more expensive for the same externalities and service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Eating the billionaires sounds more and more attractive every day.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Eating the rich just gives you gas (and prion disease). Compost the rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 518K

    Comments