- Nigel Farage, a prominent Brexiteer and broadcaster, claimed that his bank accounts have been closed without given reason, suggesting serious political persecution at the highest level.
- Farage refused to name the prestigious banking group involved but stated that the closures were part of an establishment plot to force him out of the UK.
- Other parties and politicians on the right of politics, such as the Reclaim Party and Reform UK, have also reportedly been denied bank accounts or had accounts closed, indicating a coordinated effort by financial institutions to target right-wing figures.
The truth is at the end of the article. Banks are refusing because he has additional costs attached to himself. This is his ego coming back to bite him. Farage said that this could make him leave the UK. He also said that he would leave if BREXIT was a disaster.
Now you have two reasons Farage, are you gone yet?
If this is true. Then Farage has no reason to keep the name of the bank secret.
In that situation, they closed his accounts. So he has evidence. The worst they can do is give a valid reason. So he either knows the reason. Or has other reasons to presume the banks will sue him if he names them.
Apparently he knows what the reason is. At the end it states because he has extra costs associated with himself.
So yes, his actions have left him as a bad investment for these banking groups. And he is openly lying about not knowing the reason. In an attempt to make some political gain. And knows full well that if he names the banking group. He will be sued into oblivion for libel or slander (depending on if he wrote it himself or just claimed it to a journalist).
It’s just basically more lies to make him seem relevant as a political force. When even Brexit supporters have little reason to pay him attention now. He is desperately trying to make himself (and other small right wing parties) seem like a threat to the main parties. By indicating there is some conspiracy to remove his political effectiveness.
He has every reason, because he’s under investigation. The banks (neither the one that closed his accounts nor the 7 others that refused to open for him) almost certainly can’t give details for legal reasons.
An MP accused him of accepting £550,000 from RT, so it likely has something to do with that, or perhaps something else they’ve uncovered.
Basically, watch this space, criminal charges may well follow.
If an account is under investigation. Would it not be frozen, so no changes may occur. Rather than closed.
Seems to me, closing an account would have very much the opposite effect of hiding evidence in an investigation. And most investigations would not even freeze it. They would just seek the historical data. Frozen would only happen if they had evidence that the money was going somewhere illegal. Or coming from. Because freezing or closing someone’s account is an event that affects the person. So, a punishment before proof of a crime. Not an event done in an investigation.
And you are correct. Refusing to open an account because you are suspected of but not convicted of a crime. Would def be illegal. So the banks would not tell him that. Meaning, he has no reason not to declare bank a refused me an account without reason. As the bank cannot then say. No, we told you, you can’t have an account because you are too poor. And sue him.
Also, a person being under investigation. Is not something the legal system is allowed to keep secret from the person. They need warrants etc to gain rights to see your bank details. You legally have a right to know that. So while a bank may not be able to tell the world why your bank is frozen. They sure as hell can tell you. And sue you if you claim they refused to inform you why.
Our legal system has generally evolved to prevent organizations not giving reasons for fiscal choices. Because back in the past, it was used to enforce racism and other prejudice. It’s still far from perfect.
But a bank is def required to follow its own guidelines. And document those guidelines. Before closing people’s accounts or making fiscal decisions about them.
While I was in the US when I worked as a bank software engineer. So the rules are a little different. The UK def has similar rules. Innn fact more limitations, as people a legal right to get the information used to make choices about them.
TL;DR an MP accused him of accepting £550,000 from Russian state news organisation RT.
The banks probably can’t say anything for legal reasons. However the fact that it’s happening, and the fact that 7 banks have rejected him from opening a new account, strongly suggest it’s true.
A bank wouldn’t close a persons account due to political allegiance. It’s more likely they’ve been doing dodgy shit.
Farage refused to name the prestigious banking group
The term “prestigious banking group” tends to give it away. These types of banks expect account owners to prove they are a viable investment. So while you are correct, they will not close for political reasons. They will definitely close accounts because he has been unable to gain the political investment he has in the past.
These banks tend to give extra privileges that cost them. But more using accounts like this they are known for their customer evaluation methods. So other rich people know your rough status when you use them.
I remember hearing loads of reports about expensive gifts and use of property from Brexit backing millionaires not long after 2016. So that funding would be enough to support accounts at banks like Coutts. One of the smaller ones. Who are rumoured to drive members to a fancy event. To prove they have £1m in flexible assets every few years.
“Farage expresses concern that without a bank account, he feels like a non-person and may struggle to exist and function in modern-day Britain, suggesting that life in the country is becoming unlivable for him.”
He is finally feeling the consequences of brexit. This is exactly how a hateful nationalist should feel. Like a non person.
Fuck around? Its fine out time.
Good riddance
