8 points

Why put such a shitty spin on it? We’re developing clean fuel tech – focus on that, mention the increase in costs, and spin it as a way to accelerate the transition to electric mobility.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Good. Some people will try to phrase this as a bad thing because yes, you will pay more (eventually, anyway – article says they don’t expect “any real bite until around 2025”). But we should be paying more given the environmental damage that burning this fuel causes. We should not be effectively subsidizing oil companies by paying the cost of their negative externalities.

If anything, I think there should be even more than this. We should have Norway style taxation on fuel. They have a massive savings fund that massively dwarfs our own closest equivalent.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’ll just ride my bike more. I’m easily saving $2-6 per errand by using a bike instead of a car.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

More incentive for people to look at hybrids or electric for their next car.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

sounds good to me.

Conservatives will oppose it because they live in a fantasy world view fed to them by people working for oil companies.

permalink
report
reply

Canada

!canada@lemmy.ca

Create post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Regions

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social & Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.4K

    Posts

  • 50K

    Comments

Community moderators