84 points

Sounds like a cost of living adjustment to me.

I’d also like to know where these surveys are being run, as the COL varies wildly between states.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Same. Median income in my MSA is only about $34k, and I’d also like to see the education/experience breakdowns for this data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

median here is 57k and there’s gross giant houses like two blocks away so it’s a pretty nice area

but the cost of living here is reasonable. or was prepandemic

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s national.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Seems reasonable. Life is expensive as fuck.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

$10 for a jar of pickles. Bit of a luxury now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Who’s your pickle guy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Time to start bootlegging pickles

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

That’s awesome average jobs are paying 78k! Pretty sure employees don’t demand anything.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Average job seekers want 78k, that doesn’t mean the average job is 78k.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

But then that stat is meaningless. I want a million dollars. Who cares? But if employees are moving to new companies for 78k, then I would report “employees want 78k for a new job”. It wouldn’t makes sense to report that “employers don’t want to pay 78k” because they never want to pay anything.

This is worded to make labor seem unreasonable on purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What article are you reading? I’m not seeing anything about “employers refuse to pay 78k”, only that offers are less than that (and still significantly more than what they were this time last year). The article seems to put more stock in the marked difference in demands and offers between women and men.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

So:

The average reservation wage of U.S. jobs seekers — the lowest annual pay workers would accept for a new job — climbed to a record high of $78,645 in July, up from $72,873 at the same time last year, according to the survey.

Combined with:

Yet the average full-time wage offer received in the past four months was $69,475, itself a marked increase from $60,764 last July.

So that’s a ~13.5% increase in full-time wage offers vs a ~7.5% increase in ask. This seems like a non-story then, yes? Inflation has pushed wages higher which has pushed expectations higher. However, the offer increase is higher than the ask increase so… Am I missing something here?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I agree it’s a non story. I mean, take out the numbers and the headline is pretty much “employees want more money and employers don’t want to give it”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

But that’s my point, employers are giving it (kinda, I’ll circle-back to this). The full-time offer has gone up $9k in the last 12 months. Contrasted with the ask that has only gone up $6k in that same time-frame.

Now, is $70k a livable wage? Hard to say without a more specific location. In bumfuck Alabama, probably. In LA, hell no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In bumfuk Alabama that’ll make you one of, if not the, richest people there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I agree with you totally. I made the same point lower down and it got downvoted ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Unsurprising. $78k/yr comes out to $2194/mo take home pay per Smartasset’s calculator. Average rent is well over $1k/mo with no signs of going down any time soon. Landlords frequently demand potential renters have an income of 3x the rent. Gotta live somewhere.

Apparently I’m stupid but I’m too tired to fix it rn so I will just leave my shame up here for all to see. My point is being alive is expensive and bad math or no I’m still not surprised to see this.

Edit again because I’m also too stupid to do a strikethrough correctly even with a formatting bar right there. FML and F this phone too, I’m going to bed

permalink
report
reply
12 points

This math doesn’t add up 78k is 6.5/mo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was gonna say, I made 2k/month take home at 28k.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

They may have taken the “semi-monthly take home pay” to be monthly instead, and the calculator counts after taxes.

So it’s twice what they think it is, and four times what average rent is. You can change it to monthly, and it’s more like $4,500 depending on where you live.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

right, 2000*12 is 24,000. The missing 200 amounts to about 2400. So, 26,400 take home.

Means this person is losing 50k in taxes if their take home is 2190 a month and they make 78k

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It doesn’t. They just didn’t read the actual link.

That’s $2194 semi monthly. So $4400 a month.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The calculator defaults to semi-monthly and I think the original commenter didn’t change it. Also, it defaults to your current location so the take-home will be different for everyone running the calculator (because taxes). $78k is $6500 a month BEFORE TAXES.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Uhhhh… that math isn’t mathing right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You do realize that says semi-monthly, right? Which is twice a month.

So $4400 a month which is right on par with $6500 a month before taxes ($78k).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

$78k/yr comes out to $2194/mo take home pay

Just pointing out, that’s semi monthly according to that page. So $4400/month.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 524K

    Comments