Japan announced it will start releasing radioactive wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean starting Thursday. The move has been condemned by a number of Pacific nations, including China.

Also, I saw reddit libs downplaying it, coming up with excuses about low radioactivity, and why it’s not a bad thing, so they can go back to brunch. All because it’s Japan doing it, which can do no wrong. If it were China, they’d be frothing at the mouth.

18 points
*

I agree with the libs on this one.

"The water is being treated by what’s called an Advanced Liquid Processing System, which can reduce the amounts of more than 60 selected radionuclides to government-set releasable levels, except for tritium, which officials say is safe for humans if consumed in small amounts.

About 70% of the water held in the tanks still contains cesium, strontium, carbon-14 and other radionuclides exceeding government-set levels. It will be retreated until the concentrations meet those limits, then diluted by more than 100 times its volume of seawater before it is released. That will bring it way below international safety limits, but its radioactivity won’t be zero."

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Safe and effective

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Unfortunately I have to side with (or at least humor) the reddit libs on this one. People are so propagandized against anything to do with nuclear power that it’s hard to judge whether their concerns are reasonable or fictional. Like, the way tritium is disposed of everywhere else is IIRC to more or less just dump it into the ocean (though obviously in a more controlled setting). Obviously state-level actors like China raising concerns adds credence but as far as I know, the IAEA are trustworthy as well. At any rate, I’m still not convinced without seeing actual numbers on eg how much tritiated water there is.

All that said eh they could just build more storage tanks

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I mostly agree. In the hypothetical that there’s so much tritium that it’s unsafe to release, even diluted so much, though, I’m thinking about what could be done. Apparently there are ways to distill tritium out from water, and because there’s so little tritium relative to water, you could presumably store whatever was less in some tanks. Tritium’s half-life is 12-ish years and 8 half-lives is enough for it to be almost nothing, so whatever storage they make would be fine if it only lasted for a century.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If India could get a spaceship to land on the Moon. Japan could send this water out into space.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

They would have to send 2.2 million metric tons of water into space, costing over a trillion dollars. And when one of the rockets inevitably blows up, the environmentalists would cry over some steam that’s less radioactive than an airplane flight.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That’d be really funny if it happened though. Maybe we should try blowing up the contaminated water. Itbwill never hurt anyone ever again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I will shower myself in Fukushima Daiichi wastewater mist

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We would also be removing that much water from the water cycle

permalink
report
parent
reply

Super heated ocean + spicy water + 6th mass extinction event + hurricane season

What could go wrong?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Record high ocean temps, mix in some radioactive waste, what could go wrong

permalink
report
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.7K

    Posts

  • 131K

    Comments