part so ptee does duty for the holos we soon grow to use of an
allforabit. Here (please to stoop) are selveran cued peteet peas of
quite a pecuniar interest inaslittle as they are the pellets that make
the tomtummy's pay roll. Right rank ragnar rocks and with these
rox orangotangos rangled rough and rightgorong. Wisha, wisha,
whydidtha? Thik is for thorn that's thuck in its thoil like thum-
fool's thraitor thrust for vengeance. What a mnice old mness it
all mnakes! A middenhide hoard of objects! Olives, beets, kim-
mells, dollies, alfrids, beatties, cormacks and daltons. Owlets' eegs
(O stoop to please!) are here, creakish from age and all now
quite epsilene, and oldwolldy wobblewers, haudworth a wipe o
grass. Sss! See the snake wurrums everyside! Our durlbin is
sworming in sneaks. They came to our island from triangular
Toucheaterre beyond the wet prairie rared up in the midst of the
cargon of prohibitive pomefructs but along landed Paddy Wip-
pingham and the his garbagecans cotched the creeps of them
pricker than our whosethere outofman could quick up her whats-
thats. Somedivide and sumthelot but the tally turns round the
same balifuson. Racketeers and bottloggers.
    Axe on thwacks on thracks, axenwise. One by one place one
be three dittoh and one before. Two nursus one make a plaus-
ible free and idim behind. Starting off with a big boaboa and three-
legged calvers and ivargraine jadesses with a message in their
mouths. And a hundreadfilled unleavenweight of liberorumqueue
to con an we can till allhorrors eve. What a meanderthalltale to
unfurl and with what an end in view of squattor and anntisquattor
and postproneauntisquattor! To say too us to be every tim, nick
and larry of us, sons of the sod, sons, littlesons, yea and lealittle-
sons, when usses not to be, every sue, siss and sally of us, dugters
of Nan! Accusative ahnsire! Damadam to infinities!
    True there was in nillohs dieybos as yet no lumpend papeer
in the waste, and mightmountain Penn still groaned for the micies
to let flee. All was of ancientry. You gave me a boot (signs on
it!) and I ate the wind. I quizzed you a quid (with for what?) and
you went to the quod. But the world, mind, is, was and will be
writing its own wrunes for ever, man, on all matters that fall 

Naughty naughty! Look, I like what you are doing but you should be aware if you aren’t already that you are posting copywritten material.

https://joycefoundation.utulsa.edu/joyce-copyright/joyce-works-copyright-public-domain/

These works go into the public domain in 2035, meaning at that time you can distribute the whole work as a PDF or whatever for free. Until then, what you are doing isn’t considered “fair use” unless it is transformative and/or something like 70% of the original work has been altered.

Doubtful that anyone will crack down on you here but mods may not like it and since this is text it is trivially easy for publishers to search and submit DMCA takedown requests. If the instance owners get one they will not be on your side - to keep the instance they will need to remove these posts.

Anyway, good luck either way. If you wanted to review the book and provide excepts that would be transformative and fair use (which is why reaction videos of copywritten content is or almost is fair use). But this doesn’t seem to be your goal so I wish you well.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

Naughty naughty! Look, I like what you are doing but you should be aware if you aren’t already that you are posting copywritten material.

It was copyrighted at one time…

These works go into the public domain in 2035,

Are you sure about that? Do you know about Europe’s copyright dates? And further, are you basing that on 1939 copyright date… when I’m posting content from a decade earlier, 1928?

permalink
report
parent
reply

I posted the link which contains all the questions you’re asking including information on other countries. That link says that finnegans wake goes into public domain 2035.

I am not advocating for this copyright system and I can only speak for what I know from US law but in the US publishers have been pushing public domain release dates further and further. Disney is probably the worst offender, as they have pushed to have copyright extended for 70 years after walt Disney’s death.

I wouldn’t pose myself as an expert in Europe’s copyright law but again the link from the james joyce foundation states when this work goes into public domain.

This is the org that would need to send a takedown notice to get this content removed, and this is what they are claiming.

European Union, United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland

All editions of Joyce’s works published during his lifetime are in the public domain in these countries. An exception appears to be Spain, which has a copyright term of the author’s life plus 80 years. Joyce’s lifetime-published works will remain in copyright there until the end of 2021.

The issue for instance owners and for you is that there isn’t an easy way to gate this content to only those countries. It’s usually easier just to remove it.

Does archive.org have the book? You could probably post those links, and let archive.org take the heat. They currently are arguing that they are a library and should be allowed to distribute these works. No idea how well that will go but instance owners probably wouldn’t care about links to an archive.org page.

Looks like they do.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I see you seek this kind of participation out. “On the internet, not everyone knows you’re an idiot.” being your profile statement. And that I’m not the first Lemmy community you have come along to concerning your copyright topics. Are you being paid by copyright holders to do this or something? Is it is some project or business to make USA copyright convention a world wide standard, ignoring that even in Joyce’s home focus of Ireland the work is no longer copyrighted?

Going around openly saying you are out to demonstrate other people are idiots… I think is a pretty well paved path to try and drag down societies in total.
“The chief deficiency I see in the skeptical movement is its polarization: Us vs. Them — the sense that we have a monopoly on the truth; that those other people who believe in all these stupid doctrines are morons; that if you’re sensible, you’ll listen to us; and if not, to hell with you. This is nonconstructive. It does not get our message across. It condemns us to permanent minority status.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

permalink
report
parent
reply

Finnegans Wake

!finneganswake@bulletintree.com

Create post

Finnegans Wake by James Joyce
“fragments from Work in Progress”, 1928.

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 17

    Posts

  • 13

    Comments