Is the approved confusing language a done-deal or can it be challenged in court?
@Bob @jack The issue’s proponents have not yet published a statement saying they will sue over it. Keep an eye on their newsletter to see if they decide to challenge it: https://us17.campaign-archive.com/home/?u=8cede0d6ebc1b54023a8c991c&id=cf13c0016b
Assholes gonna asshole.
The issue 1 vote in Franklin County had some blatantly bullshit propaganda posters hung up in the voting line. Scummy shit that made me laugh
I saw a lot of pro-1 yard signs in Wood and Ottawa counties (which ultimately both leaned No, thankfully), and among them was a sign purporting that supporting Issue 1 would protect the Second Amendment. I’d have loved to witness the mental gymnastics it would have taken for someone to argue that in good faith—which is a rare thing for a population so tightly wrapped in religion…
I saw enough pro-1 signs in Summit county, where I live, but I don’t recall seeing anything that egregious.
This is why they rail so hard against education too, in hopes that their “baffle them with bullshit” methods will work.
