2 points

I mean, just looking at this from a practical stand point, how many people actually look at 600 posts a day, that seems really excessive. I doubt 95% of twitter users are going to hit that limit. Though it would look a lot less like a money grab and more to keep information gathering if he’d made it a flat 6000 across all accounts instead of just the verified ones

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I thought the same at first, but apparently anything you scroll past counts as a post. Users are hitting their limits in 5 to 20 minutes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lolz, well in that case their screwed I assumed it was based of interaction. Thats the exact way I used twitter when I was on it. Scroll for a full min until you see something intresting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

So, so far this year we’ve got Imgur, who thinks the internet does not run on porn, Twitter who thinks keeping users from their service is a good idea, Reddit who thinks nuking their freely made moderator infrastructure works and Youtube who also thinks randomly banning people who are smart enough to use ad blockers won’t have any effect.

At this point, I’m starting to make up increasingly bizarre theories as to why techbros have suddenly all collectively gone insane. The one I came up with this morning was that they all snorted coke of the same hooker’s ass which was somehow tainted with a brain eating amoeba.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Verified accounts are limited to reading 6,000 posts a day, he tweeted, while unverified accounts are limited to just 600. New unverified accounts are at 300 posts a day.

This is absolute amateur hour. Why are people still trying to use Twitter.

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*

600 posts per day is damn nothing, yikes

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Especially considering the way twitter counts a “view” is if the tweet shows up in your app’s viewport, at all. So simply scrolling through the timeline consumes “views” - you could run up against this limit in 10-15 minutes of scrolling.

It’s incredibly stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This is what I was wondering. I don’t use Twitter so 600 sounds like a lot but I was wondering how much it actually was. Someone else said they blew through it in like 15 minutes

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Even 6000 is nothing. I remember when I used to be on the platform for hours per day, following hundreds of active users, and actively sharing to thousand of users… I’m not paying then (wasn’t an option) and I’m not paying now (not interested), but even if I did, I’d go through that in minutes!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If it’s per account, couldn’t someone that’s just absurdly dedicated to using Twitter for some reason make Alts to follow different groups of people anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Who the fuck posts 300 tweets a day?

Edit: Nvm, I apparantly can’t read lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

No, you misunderstand - the limit is on viewing tweets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What… Huh?? Twitter is limiting the amount of engagement users are allowed to have? Is that what’s going on here? Do they actually think that this will make more money or are they just really insistent on making Twitter users touch grass?

permalink
report
reply
41 points

This is all fucking hilarious at this point. He’s stripped any and all value from Twitter. Glad I already put a read limit of 0 in place.

How to dismantle a decent and viable company in any % record time speedrun.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

And all because he’s just petty at how his twitter value manipulation to make some money didn’t work out.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!tech@lemmy.fmhy.ml

Create post

Talk about anything tech related!

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 58

    Posts

  • 550

    Comments