The “Readers added context” feature is the only good thing about Twitter.

111 points

Bro I love that Twitter’s fact checker is just so fuckin petty to Elon lmao

permalink
report
reply
81 points

I’m surprised he hasn’t got rid of it yet. Maybe he has to have it in order to keep his few remaining advertisers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The thing is, it’s usually long enough after his comments have had their impact that these additions are made. It’s really his having/eating cake feature. He can say some out and out false shit, it gets picked up by his base and spread, the community mod a day or two later goes “actually”, and if someone calls him out he can just say “oh but the community mod set things right” if he doesn’t just outright ignore it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It took a while for the note on “makes no sense” to show up, but that first one appeared almost immediately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Is this legit? That isn’t just ironic, but that last line is racists as hell. I mean, I’m fairly certain he’s racist if this is real or not but that last part was just so explicit in it

permalink
report
reply
27 points

I think (I hope) the last line is from a completely different post, not a reply to the black woman. Tbh I thought it must have been a reply to someone with an NFT chimp avatar. It’s much nicer here in my naïve/sheltered mind than the real world 😕

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s a different post/thread - you can tell from the time lines with the chimp one being made in 2018. However, no idea what the context of that was, and I’m not going to use Xitter to find out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

it has to be because if he actually blocked her she wouldn’t be able to reply to his tweets anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I think she’s attaching his chimp comment in her reply as a way of displaying his hypocrisy.

But I’m not sure. I’ve never used Twitter and always find the screenshots stupid to read.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I didn’t use twitter before Elon bought it, and have stayed much further away since he has. It’s possible I’m misreading due to something like that, but if I am that’s also poor design. It looks like a legitimate reply to hers. If users can manipulate replies in line with their tweets that just makes the site even worse

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m not a big Twitter user but how you know this isn’t a reply; firstly the date. The chimp tweet is 7 years old, the block conversation is from 3 days ago. Secondly, you see the white vertical lines between musks first and second tweet? That indicates it’s part of the same thread. The chimp tweet doesn’t have one because the woman has “quote tweeted” something he said in the past. Finally you see how “blocked” is in bold in his last tweet? That happens when you search for a word - it appears in bold in the results. I believe the woman went to musk’s profile and searched all his tweets for “blocked”. Then she quote tweeted it back to him in this conversation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

After looking again I did notice the chimp comment is dated 2018, so I believe I’m correct

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I wrote (and then deleted) a furious comment because I thought he was responding to her directly, too. I think she’s just retweeting an older tweet of his, though… which is why I deleted the furious comment.

Still, it’s not much of a stretch to imagine him actually, deliberately saying this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He’s a white South African who’s daddy made his money with slave labor. He’s definitely a racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Can someone ELI5 what is the “Readers added context” feature?

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

I haven’t added one myself, but this is my understanding: all Twitter users can opt into the community notes feature but at first you can only rate notes as helpful or unhelpful. Once you’ve rated 5 notes you have the ability to write your own. You can do so on any tweet, but if your note(s) don’t get enough “helpful” ratings, you lose your ability to write them. You have to go back to rating notes - once you’ve rated 5 more you can write again.

When you add a note you chose a reason why you’re adding it, similar to explaining why you’re reporting a comment on lemmy. If you say that the original tweet is misleading you have to say why and provide a source. It only shows on the tweet to everyone if you get enough “helpful” ratings from the people who have opted into the scheme.

Not very EILI5 but you get the jist!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Thanks, now I understand this better… And yeah this dude is a real jerk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

He’s such an amazing piece of shit that he claimed “chimp” was just local non-racial slang in totally not racist South Africa.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Wouldn’t be surprised if this is just yet another genius move for introducing blocks as a paid feature.

permalink
report
reply

Murdered by Words

!murderedbywords@feddit.uk

Create post

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

  • Personal appearance (“You’re fat”, “You’re ugly”)
  • Posts with little-to-no context
  • Posts based on a grammar/spelling error
  • Dick jokes, “Yo mama”, “No, you” type responses and other low effort insults
  • “Your values are bad” without any logcal or factual ways of showing that they are wrong (“I believe in capitalism” - “Well, then you must be evil” or “Fuck you you ignorant asshole”)

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

Community stats

  • 11

    Monthly active users

  • 29

    Posts

  • 1.3K

    Comments