92 points

Nice hearing about something Poland is doing right!

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Poland does many things right

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

I’m sure it does. The thing is I mostly hear about the things Poland does wrong. That’s what trends to break into international news. That’s why I worded my comment the way I did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

…as long as it doesn’t offend the church.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Is that unusual for Poland? I have no idea, myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Poland is doing a lot of things wrong on the judicial side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

By “judicial side” you mean “Poland is going Hungary/Israel judicial style”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

A common theme these days

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

Agree 100%. It’s just an unhealthy dose of sugar and caffeine, which is hardly regulated.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

To be fair, it’s the same amount of sugar as most other sodas and had less caffeine than a typical coffee. The real issue is that a lot of their marketing targets a younger audience who probably shouldn’t be drinking caffeinated drinks yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

I say this as a long term caffeine for the rest of my life addict. Coffee + sugar is a wildly different effect than just coffee. I avoid sugar completely during my coffee hours.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Hi. What’s the different effect? I’ve never considered that before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The most popular energy drinks in Sweden are sugar free but contain 180mg of caffeine, that’s two large cups of coffee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A tall coffee at Starbucks has about 230mg of caffeine and that’s fairly typical. A large coffee at 90mg would either be 2/3rds decaf or incredibly watery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Energy drinks often contain a bunch of other stuff - e.g. Taurine, which isn’t necessarily bad per se, as it eliminates some of the caffeine side effects (jitteriness), but that may arguably make it more addictive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Then the real solution would be regulating their marketing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

That’s not a bad idea.

Now let’s stop calling them ‘energy’ drinks.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Curious what you’d call them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ah gotcha. Wasn’t sure if it was a pedantic thing or an ideological thing. Totally agree with you that ‘energy’ is a misnomer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Then what would you call Bang with 0 calories & sugars and 300mg of caffeine? I drink that (half a can each time) when I want to stay up a little later that night, like on weekends and new game releases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

“Can’t believe it’s not energy! drink”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Caffeine soda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

“Chemical Caffeine”?

“Bull Jizz n Juice”?

Uhh…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

These would be great names for mixed drinks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

eh, fair enough. teenage energy drink addiction has caused me years of insomnia. we already have an age restriction on energy drinks in the UK, though it’s 16 not 18

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

I don’t think that’s true anymore. The ban wasn’t formally finalised and was quietly dropped during the pandemic. The store I work at still sells energy drinks to under 16s. We used to have to check, but they changed it and took the warning off our tills.

ETA: stores can implement their own policies though, if they do wish to age check people buying energy drinks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I have no idea what’s going on then lol. pretty much every shop I’ve been to has asked for ID when buying energy drinks

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It is essentially a popular voluntary movement by stores.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Reading those comments drops your IQ by 5 points. Now calculate the economic impact that will have… You can’t because reading this comment drops your IQ by another 5 points :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the whole point of banning energy drink sales to minors is that minors are at a higher increase of heart issues because their body can’t handle caffeine like adults. but sure, everyone else is the idiot on this one and “the economy” is definitely more important than kids’ health

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

That’s the most reasonable thing i’ve read today.

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

Yeah. Energy drinks are fucking scams.

No wonder people who actually need energy don’t use them while those who sit on their ass all day do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I take it you’ve never been anywhere near a military base or construction site

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The best workers are hydrating with good ol’ water.

The kids are drinking ‘energy’ drinks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The thing is that they taste good. But there is no justification for their price tag( coca cola and pepsi sodas actually fall in the same bucket,quite good but why would you buy them for that price,especialy since it costs them next to nothing to make ).

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

As far as I can tell, the difference between the brand colas and the non-brand ones, is that the brand ones don’t destroy my guts. 2 cups of the cheaper colas and I’m shitting liquid for a week.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments