154 points

However, Jacksonville City Councilwoman Ju’Coby Pittman, who delivered remarks before DeSantis took the stage, stepped to ask the crowd to quiet down and listen.

“It ain’t about parties today,” she told the audience. “A bullet don’t know a party.”

The bullet may not know a party, but the gun and shooter absolutely did, and it’s 10000% obvious where the party affiliation lies. Anybody who pretends otherwise should be ignored and mercilessly kicked for their ignorance and/or lies.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Yeah. One party is guilty of stochastic terrorism. They’ve been emboldening Nazi racist fuckwits for years now. The fuck did they expect was going to happen? Of course they don’t care they just want power, regardless of whatever it costs the rest of us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

They don’t care if the entire country burns down to the ground, as long as they get to rule over the pile of ashes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Glad I saw this because that’s exactly what I was thinking. Gun advocates love to call for the shooter, not the weapon so in this case, the shooter is absolutely affiliated and the current republican party enables and encourages this behavior. Apparently it’s appropriate to pray at the vigil YOU enabled. Disgusting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
19 points

Are they really dogwhistles when it’s so obvious? Pretty much air raid sirens at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

He almost certainly expected this and it’s almost certainly a part of a play. It’s really obvious to anyone that this would happen. I’d bet he now goes around and talks about how uncivilized and hostile the people were and how he’s the victim of the woke mob, or whatever. I don’t think he’s stupid, and that’s the most dangerous part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

I’m partially impressed Desantis 1. had the gall to show up. 2. was likely expecting not to get booed. Plz someone get this clown out of my state and exile him to one of those plastic islands out in the center of most Seas

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Now that he is slowly giving up on the presidency. He is starting to realize the state, he abandoned/ignored for his entire “Presidential world tour and crusade on Wokeness”, is in trouble.

Needless to say, Florida people aren’t happy about that. Even the quiet ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

any residual damage is short lived

Don’t worry, it never is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Needless to say, Florida people aren’t happy about that. Even the quiet ones.

Unfortunately, many of them are slow learners. They re-elected him after he suspended a state attorney for no good reason and sent migrants up to Martha’s Vineyard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

When Ron’s people don’t have complete control of an event like this vigil, this is what you get. Wait until they have no choice over who can ask him questions. Don’t be deceived by the show.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

What did he expect would happen? How delusional is this guy. His audience is KKK rallies and Cuban conservatives. Let him stick to that.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

He was probably hoping to be booed so he can something something woke people something something.

permalink
report
parent
reply

What did he expect would happen?

Although I fully support the booing, you have to figure the idea was that the backlash of “Governor Didn’t Care Enough to Show Up” would have been greater than the backlash of “Well duh, of course he got booed.”

I don’t know whether that’s true, but I feel pretty sure that’s the calculus that drove the decision to go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Good, well deserved

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 482K

    Comments