Link to comic: https://xkcd.com/2821/

17 points

If like me you can’t see the picutre of the post, here is the original image:

reveal

permalink
report
reply
3 points

What’s up with that? I can’t see any of the pictures hosted here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m not positive but it might be due to the steps the Lemm.ee admin is taking to combat the CSAM uploads that have been happening and prevent the server’s administration team from being liable for potentially harmful and illegal images being hosted on their server.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Somehow he keeps on making awesome stuff, after all these years

permalink
report
reply
77 points
*

Alt text.

Of course you get an ice cream cone for the swimmer too! You’re not a monster

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Now I want to see someone swimming with a cone of ice cream in each hand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You want me to wear my swim trunks or get a bikini… Warning before your answer: only one body type has the bouyancy to pull it off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

As an Aussie, I don’t see why that is unusual. You use your feet. But if it’s only two icecreams, then you hold them both in one hand and swim with the other one. All I can say about this one though is that this is a very flat beach: Waves would ruin the icecream pretty bloody fast. Must be a river or something.

Do people not swim with icecreams in other countries?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do people not swim with icecreams in other countries?

Never heard of anyone doing it no, so probably not? 🤷

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks, was disappointed about no alt text 🙏

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points

I spent way too long trying to figure out why the guy and the ice cream shop were flying, and how he would move horizontally in he air…

permalink
report
reply
38 points
*

I couldn’t tell what I was looking at until I searched for an explanation. All I could see was a person falling into some water past a floating ice cream stall. It’s supposed to be a beach:

https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2821:_Path_Minimization

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

“we have a beach at home”

the beach in question

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, I just thought it was two dudes racing to get ice cream first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was more like: but if he choses the alternative paths, he doesn’t get the ice cream - that doesn’t make sense! Then I understood our priorities differ.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Path that maximises time would be some kind of space-filling curve. Maybe it does that off panel?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Basically, yes. The path that maximises time goes around the world, so starts by going up off the top of the screen, and re-enters at the bottom.

Technically I think it could be a little longer by spiralling around the world several times, still reaching the target point despite going “in a straight line”. If we ignore the “straight line” restriction, which some of the other paths already do, then the sky’s the limit. Technically actually, the sky isn’t the limit, and the path could criss-cross over the whole planet first, and the air, and the whole galaxy, before reaching the destination as the last feasible space to arrive at. Personally I think that’s too complex for xkcd, if they are going for complex I’m sure they would have come up with something about paths through n-space and black-hole theory that is beyond my pay grade.

Xkcd good ;)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It would have to be a different panel but you could draw it as the whole screen being black except of the character and the destination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If it’s a space filling curve as Octoperson suggested, it wouldn’t need to be big. Isn’t a space filling curve infinite length if its offset is infinitesimal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s the path that maximises time, not distance. Technically the path that maximises time could look the same as the path that minimises distance, they could just sit down and wait decades until a minute before they die of natural causes and then get up and head to the end, and that’s assuming that they need to arrive alive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

path that maximizes time? just don’t move. at all

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s to do with light paths and diffraction. The time maximising path still hast to be a valid path.

permalink
report
parent
reply

xkcd

!xkcd@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 247

    Posts

  • 5.7K

    Comments

Community moderators