Yes yes, language changes over time. I’ve heard that mantra for decades and I know it. That doesn’t mean there aren’t language changes that aren’t grating when they become fashionable (and hopefully temporary).

For me, “morals” being used as a crude catch-all application of “morality,” “ethics,” “integrity” or related concepts bothers me. Sentence example: “Maybe if society had morals there wouldn’t be so many minorities in prison.”

An even more annoying otherwise-fluent-speaker modification I see is when “conscious” is used to mean “consciousness” and “conscience” interchangeably. Sentence example: “Single mothers on welfare that steal baby formula have no conscious.” It sounds like they’re saying the shoplifter is not mentally aware of their own actions, not that they’re lacking sufficient “morals” to let their baby starve for the sake of Rules-Based Order™.

There’s others, but those two come up enough recently, with sufficient newness, for me to bring them up here. Some old classic language quirks are so established and entrenched that even though I hate them, bringing them up would likely invite some hatemail and maybe some mystery alt accounts also sending hatemail after that. You know, because they “could care less(sic)” about what I think.

23 points

English had a big French spelling phase, so a bunch of our words have entirely different phonetic sounds vs their spelling. I constantly mess this up. Go ahead, make me spell bourgoise or bureacracy the first time. Nope failed again! Conscious/Conscience are definitely in that category.

For me I’m not sure if Math or Maths are correct

permalink
report
reply

Me with a time machine: going back and shooting William the Bastard in the head to save the English language

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Use a Kuh-nife when you do it, you bold Kuh-night of Time!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You’re not a real leftist if you can spell bourgeiouiuiouiise on the first try

permalink
report
parent
reply

Burgersee

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Boojwah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

bour-gee-ois-ee is how I remember it

permalink
report
parent
reply

First off, amazing username.

Anyway, a tip to spell bourgeoisie that someone here recommended was to sing it to the tune of the Mickey Mouse song. Which, embarrassingly, is the only way I can spell it.

B O U … R G E … O I S I E! Bourgeoisie! Bourgeoisie! Who steals the surplus value from you and me? B O U R G E O I S I E!

And then yeah if you need bourgeois just lop off the final I E

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Young people don’t know how to sing the Mickey mouse song

permalink
report
parent
reply

Intellectuals are haram. Ask Gramsci.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

“Grey/gray” trips me the fuck up and I’m an English teacher.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I never get that right!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If it’s in Burgerland it’s gray.

If it’s in Jelliedeelland it’s grey.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

English had a big French spelling phase

Laughs in William the Conqueror

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fun page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences

North Americans contract ‘mathematics’ to ‘math’, most other places shorten it to ‘maths’. I don’t even know if one is more “correct” or if the entire word ‘mathematics’ was a mistake. Honestly, the North Americans might be right about this one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

use the fucking oxford comma you godforsaken cretins

permalink
report
reply
8 points

There is almost no scenario in which using the Oxford comma fails to improve sentence clarity.

People are just too lazy to use punctuation for its intended purpose, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

no more half measures walter

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

both the oxford comma and the lack of an oxford comma can introduce ambiguity in different situations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

both, the, oxford, comma, and, the, lack, of, an, oxford, comma, can, introduce, ambiguity, in, different, situations,.,

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck you and the coward’s comma

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fuck you, cowards and commas!

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

“could care less”

THIS

“it means the same thing!” they say

IF COULD CARE LESS MEANS THE SAME AS COULD NOT CARE LESS THEN THE WORD “NOT” IS ENTIRELY MEANINGLESS

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

permalink
report
reply
8 points

The people that usually say “could care less” tend to “care less” about saying it correctly because apathy is super cool just like based atrocity enjoying stoner drunk science man Rick Sanchez said it was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

The fact 99% of people use the word “logical” to mean “reasonable” because they literally don’t know what logic is.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Logic means you feel very strongly about your opinion and you want to imply that those who disagree with you are illogical.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I am irrationally irritated when people describe something as “addicting” rather than “addictive”. I’m not even sure it’s technically incorrect, and language is a fluid thing so this shouldn’t irritate me. But I still have to consciously tell myself to not be annoyed by it.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

In this house the only thing we call addicting is addictinggames.com 😤

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That counts; the quirk doesn’t even necessarily have to be “wrong” to be annoying to an individual.

permalink
report
parent
reply

In my defense I don’t think I’ve ever actually corrected anybody, I just stew inside my own skull

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’ve given up on trying to correct people for the most part because language does change over time and new norms are established whether or not I’m comfortable with them. Sure, some of them are clumsy and staggeringly incorrect (like “conscious” being used in place of “conscience”) but if it’s done enough times, it’ll become the expected way to communicate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It feels like an Americanism to me. I pretty much only see it on the internet

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think you’re right about that

permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.1K

    Posts

  • 40K

    Comments