Hey, I just did a quick browse through the blocked instances list for infosec.pub and have a few questions about it. Seems like we are blocking sh.itjust.works which at first glance just looks like one of the bigger general purpose instances. Meanwhile more overtly problematic instances like lemmygrad (tankie instance) or exploding heads (“free speech extremists”) are federated with. Generally the block list seems fairly small compared to a lot of other instances.

So are these intentional choices or is it more a matter of the admins not (having the time to be) bothering with it? If it’s not intentional, maybe checking some other instances blocklists to weed out the biggest trolls/offenders could be useful.

11 points

Blocking shitjustworks but federating with the loud extremists? Yikes

permalink
report
reply
5 points

What site is the “loud extremists”?

I block instances that are the source of issues - shitjustworks caused a river of complaints - I don’t think I’ve seen any from the others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hexbear, Lemmygrad, and Exploding Heads. Hexbear is far left… or at least pretending to be. They’re damaging to leftist causes. Lemmygrad is actually far left. Exposing Heads is far right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oof that’s not a good look

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Get out while you still can.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

:)

permalink
report
reply
7 points

You can block problematic users/instances yourself if they bother you. I just blocked all of exploding-heads and haven’t seen any of their shit since.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

Only if you use the right apps. Lemmy itself doesn’t have any instance blocking for users yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

IMO it’s not a good solution to just say “just block the bigots”. The problem is that for new users, they are going to see those bigoted posts. They’re going to either think that’s what kind of site Lemmy is and potentially leave, or they’ll potentially get pulled in by the bigots. Both are bad situations.

Especially for blatant bigotry, it makes perfect sense to take measures to ensure that the site is safe for everyone by default, without every individual person having to take action (especially those without accounts or not signed in).

permalink
report
parent
reply

@CoderKat

I guess you define “safe” as “never being exposed to an opinion that offends you”. Good luck with that standard. It seems entirely subjective.

cc: @jonne @fr0g

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re strawmanning so hard here, it’s an actual fire hazard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So lemmy needs a “soft” block. A system that moderates it out of the default streams, but allows an individual user to still add communities they want to see in their subscriptions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Discussions related to Infosec.pub

!infosecpub@infosec.pub

Create post

Community stats

  • 20

    Monthly active users

  • 74

    Posts

  • 243

    Comments

Community moderators