50 points

I think the most novel proposal we put forward in the report is taxing the total real estate holdings of large landowners, as opposed to individually taxing each property using the aforementioned brackets. This could entail situations where large landowners own a portfolio of properties, each falling below that $3 million threshold, but that cumulatively add up to tens of millions of dollars. In this scenario, by taxing the total holdings instead of each property separately, these owners would no longer be able to avoid paying those progressive property tax rates.

There’s a few interesting bits to this article, but I like this one the most. Property taxes on the cumulative amount of property a person or company owns is huge. It provides a punishment for buying up large amounts of property.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

People already pay taxes on cumulative properties. You need this plus the progressive tax idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m 100% on board with this. Hell, why not both?

We could also do a residence + 1 option where your house and 1 other property are taxed reasonably. The any property beyond that is taxed as escalating rates that ramp up significantly for each additional property.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because the corporations will never allow it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How, exactly, does a human population become so meek that they are willing to let a piece of paper control them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think the concern is that:

  • The rich would try to skirt this with numbered or shell companies, or family or other relations.
  • The rich would pass this onto tenants.

Now, the solution is to a) couple this with rent control, b) exempt purpose-built rentals from this endeavour, and c) punish serial transgressions with confiscation.

Frankly, I think the idea of punishing malfeasance by landlords with confiscation to be just awesome: if you’re a predatory slumlord, we take the house and repurpose it as RGI public housing. Do I worry about the government becoming predatory? Yes, yes I do, but in this case it’s a lesser-of-two-evils thin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Corporations shouldn’t be allowed to own residential property in the first place. Make it illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Housing cooperatives are non-profit corporations that own property so that they can provide residential services to the members and owners of that corporation.

You know, I’m actually not 100% sure what the difference between a condominium and a cooperative is, but condos are also corporations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree but then one of two things has to happen.

  1. No one is allowed to own property
  2. Corporations need to stop being classified as people

Guess which one would come first? Be honest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Slumlords and overpriced rentals can be storage issues though. It can be a nice place, but if you’re paying $2k+/mo for a 1b1b that’s way too fucking much even if it’s in good condition

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

There are so many great ideas that could have been implemented by now, and have been implemented in other countries. But the Liberals have only instituted policies to make it worse. Only now that the youth vote is leaving them they may at least pay lip service to it. It’s honestly disgusting.

Only the greens have put forward anything that would help stem the investor class from depriving Canadians of a place to live.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Preach. I voted Green. Mike shows promise and he’s consistent with messaging. Next election I’ll more than happily stump for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Triple property taxes for units not occupied by owners. Quick fix.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Forbid corporate ownership of anything under 4 units/12 bedrooms, and require them own 100% of any contiguous building over 4 units. Added taxes will just be passed on to residents. Corporations are used to aggregate money (both public corps and family/friend groups) and avoid taxes.

Then make a financial law that forbids making property loans with collateral which includes any real property that is not the property being purchased. No condo bros buying units and then re-fi-ing out to buy more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The issue is owners just fake the documents when your property tax or vacancy tax mail arrives. Friend of mine rents basement suite, landlord has not lived in main house for over two years, it has been empty the entire time. somebody comes every few weeks to collect mail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Then why not check on it occasionally and put a hefty fine on it when they fake the documents? If you cannot make a new and important law because rich people will try to bypass it than the state is useless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Agreed.

People forging documents to evade taxes? That’s fraud. Put them in jail or if they’re a foreign national; take their property until they set foot in the country; then put them in jail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There definitetly should be a better method. An honour system by mailing and online affirmation of occupied unit is useless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’d have to have someone go door-to-door at random intervals for an absolute check, I think, but that isn’t a bad thing provided that the people doing it are paid a reasonable wage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Whistleblower law that lets people who finger this kind of landlord take ownership of the property at a nominal fee for processing the paperwork. Call it $25.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

how does that not just increase rent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Property taxes of 100% for units not occupied by owners. Income taxes on rental of 110%.

Problem solved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think you have put any thought in to this. How would that solve anything exactly? If you taxed rental income at 110% then nobody would ever be a landlord, and all existing landlords would evict their tenants immediately, leaving millions homeless. Do you just want a system where you can only live in owned properties and renting is forbidden?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

well as long as you are admitting you are ok with state sponsored theft. Very Putin of you

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

We still don’t physically have enough houses. It’s quick, but not a fix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

how about prevent cooperate take over of nin commercial property, especially foreign takeover. Look at how they’re swooping in on the victims in Hawaii after the fires.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Land value tax would fix this.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Georgism making a comeback baby!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I hope so. Subscribe to !georgism@kbin.social if you haven’t already.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Canada

!canada@lemmy.ca

Create post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


Community stats

  • 2.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.8K

    Posts

  • 54K

    Comments

Community moderators