A judge has blocked the Biden administration and other federal officials from communicating with social media companies in a case that could have far-reaching consequences for the country…

23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
32 points

And they’re going to show us this evidence right?..right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What are you, some kind of communist? Of course not. They said it exists. That’s enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Is this evidence in the room with us right now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Long story short, this judge thinks lying to the public about a pandemic, during a pandemic, is protected speech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well… Yes, it probably is. Because it’s political speech, and because there’s not a direct link to fraud or causal harm. See US v. Alvarez, 617 F. 3d 1198. When Trump says that he’s a stable genius, that’s protected speech even though 180 degrees opposed to the truth.

You’ll notice that e.g. what Trump’s attorneys said in public was very, very different from what they said to courts; it’s a criminal offense to lie to courts, but it’s largely legal and protected to lie to the public for political ends.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I hate that I agree with this. On the one hand, “lying about a pandemic during a pandemic” sure sounds a lot like “shouting fire in a crowded theater,” but things like the lab leak theory aren’t really a matter of public health. While there are times when the government can and should fight dangerous misinformation, this is the kind of executive power that needs to be kept in check by the courts for the executive’s own good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Calling disinformation about a global pandemic political speech sure is something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

That’s one of the consequences of the damage that the Trump presidency did to the US that will haunt the country for the decades to come.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Conservative opinions and comments are always inappropriate. Always. Every word uttered by a conservative is deception, manipulation, or dog-whistling some form of hate. Every single utterance.

Conservatism is inappropriate to publish. We should be moving to extinguish the plague of hatred and anti-science idiocy rather than defending it as “free speech”. Conservative speech is hate speech and should never be treated as free speech.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I’d like to know more details about the nature of the contacts. If the WH told a social media platform that they must remove some content “or else,” that could be problematic for me. But if it was “Hey, we think this story is false and you should delete it” (said to a private entity), I don’t see what the issue is.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

What horse shit.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments