As a car enthusiast, I can think of a good one, the Ford Nucleon.

During the 1950s and 1960s, there was considerable interest in nuclear power and its potential applications. This led to the idea of using nuclear energy to propel cars. The concept behind a nuclear car was to utilize a small nuclear reactor to generate steam, which would then power the vehicle’s engine.

Of course back in those days, this was extremely futurustic and some at the time thought this would be a game changer, but ultimately, the safety aspect was one of the biggest reasons why this idea was dropped, and I probably don’t have to explain why it may not have considered to be safe, I mean, it was using nuclear power, so even if the engineers tried to make it as safe as possible, IF something went wrong, it would have been catastrophic.

Ever since then, the interests in the automotive sector has shifted to Electric and Hydrogen.

Still, a very intriguing concept car and idea.

Outside cars, you have blimps, and I personally believe if we tried to make something like a hindenburg today with existing technology, we might have been a lot more successful than back then (as it goes way back to 1930s), there are still some blimps used occasionally, I also don’t believe those use hydrogen(?), but they are not the “game changer in air travel” it was once seen as, although we can’t rule out a comeback.

What about you guys?

14 points

Wasn’t there a hubbub about the Segway?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Huge.

Only a few people saw it, mostly CEOs and billionaires. They said it could revolutionize cities, which is technically true, as part of a larger transportation shift. But the rest of the public just heard ‘this will revolutionize the world’. And they didn’t do any focus groups or beta testing or anything outside of their own company, so they didn’t have anyone telling them ‘I’m not gonna pay $5k for a fucking scooter’.

And then they launched, and people started telling them ‘I’m not gonna pay $5k for a fucking scooter’. And then powered skateboards became the Next Big Thing, and then some Chinese companies realized nobody wants to learn to skate just to get around so they put a battery and a motor on a Razor scooter and suddenly Ninebot blew the fuck up.
Then Dean Kamen (inventor of Segway) got killed riding one, and Ninebot bought what was left of Segway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

fwiw looks like Dean Kamen is still alive; it was another owner - the one who bought the company from Kamen - died in the accident. someone named Jimi Heselden apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh man, I remember the hype over Segway. “It’ll change the world!” Along with the secrecy, like it was nuclear fusion or something.

Ninebot really showed them in the end, by making something nearly as good for like 1/8th the price.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Til the dude who invented Segway died while riding a Segway. That tends to put an end to things quickly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The Metaverse, I guess? It’s funny how living in a virtual world has been this hyped-up concept for decades and it finally comes out and it’s just kind of…lame for lack of a better word. Maybe it’s too early to tell, but it feels like the Web 3.0 Metaverse push hasn’t lived up to the hype.

Aside from that, I’d say the Xbox Kinect. Maybe it’s just me, but I remember that when the Kinect came out there was a lot of hype about how it was going to revolutionize how people played games. But I don’t think we ever really got a Kinect game that lived up to that hype. To be fair, I remember a lot of articles of people doing interesting things with Kinect it’s just that none of them really had anything to do with gaming.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Did actually think they would pull something off? It was all 100% advertising hype for a knock off VR Chat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Nuclear for sure. Reading old science fiction from the '50s is pretty eye opening on what promise it appeared to hold.

In my lifetime, the Genome project. I’m sure a lot of good has come of it, and will continue to do so, but when they first decided to try to decode the human genome, the promise in the air was eradication of so many diseases, increased health and longevity to humanity, etc.

The Internet for sure. It went from something that would allow the entire world to access knowledge, be better informed, make the future a real meritocracy. Instead, we ended up with magats, vaccine-effectiveness deniers, and aggressive stupidity.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

The human genome project has been very successful at progressing genetic medicine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I am willing to accept the absolute worst of humanity on the internet, because we can also have so many amazing things that weren’t previously possible.

Accessibility of information to the masses is incredibly important. Isolated populations can learn about the bigger world, get help, and share their experiences. Friends and families can stay connected. People can work together from anywhere, and create value as a team in ways that weren’t previously possible. When I was a kid it was just a dream, and now we are living it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is true, a lot of people, especially some people from older generations like to talk shit about the internet and modern age (not just social media), and it’s effects on us which can be bad but that also depends on the person, with good moderation, internet really is a dream come true isn’t it? And we are living it.

Something we shouldn’t take for granted for sure in a way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The Genome Project is the reason we can now develop vaccines for me COVID variants within weeks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The Genome project is very interesting for sure, and wow, I am learning a lot of knowledge from others here on this thread because there are some stuff that I had no idea existed before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fun fact, we are currently on the 38th major revision of the Human Genome (Google GRCh38). In the 20+ years since we completed the project, we’ve been able to design 100s of thousands of kits for genetic testing of human genetic diseases, anything from inherited diseases like Huntington’s to developed diseases, eg, cancer. Within the world of biotech, it’s one of the greatest achievements of all time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

3D TV.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Let’s be real: most of us knew it was a shitty gimmick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Both times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This was my favorite tech of all time. I don’t think most people ever got to try it where it worked without glasses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fun fact, I’m blind on one eye and so 3D TV never worked for me. The whole thing of seeing stuff coming out of the screen requires two eyes lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Damn bro haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Back in the Windows 8 days, Microsoft tried to push Universal Windows Platform (UWP), a new application format that could run on any devices running Windows 8: desktops, laptops, smartphones, tablets and even Xbox without any modification while being much more secure by default.

It failed for a multitude of reasons:

  • It was a big break from the previous application model. You had to rewrite everything.
  • To improve security, it enforced many limitation that legacy apps did not have.
  • While it was the only way to create and distribute apps for Windows Phone and Windows RT (a Windows 8 variant for low-powered laptops) their low market share did not incentivize developers to migrate to or create UWP apps.
  • It was strongly tied to the divisive Metro UI of Windows 8. People already hated interacting with this part of Windows 8, they had no desire to install apps that would force them into this UI.

UWP still lives on in Windows 10 and 11 as well as in Xbox One and Series: many system apps are now UWPs, as well as all Xbox games and apps, some cross-devices games from Microsoft Studios and some apps in the Windows Store.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Maybe I’m a curmudgeon, but I hate using “apps” on my desktop machine. They’re always designed to be friendly for touch interface and smaller screen size, and are terrible to use on my 30" monitor with a 1/8" cursor. I just want my menu bar, toolbar on the left, and status on the bottom, please and thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I hate using most apps on my phone. It’s not that I’m a curmudgeon. I’m a developer, and I don’t see any good reason for so many damned apps when a browser works just fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’ll always get asked about apps whenever a new service or whatever is launched. Even here, there’re people asking for a Lemmy/Kbin app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The worst offenders are the ones who make their mobile site impossible to use so you will download the app. Unmovable banners, incorrectly sized floating menus, and features unnecessarily locked out unless you switch to Desktop mode or use the app. Guess what, I’m definitely not installing it now!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nah, you’re not. It simply is not possible to have a single UI that works just as well on both a touch-driven 5-inch interface and a pointer-driven 20-inch interface. Different input methods require different UIs. But publishers are lazy so they try to pretend you can.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Moving to: m/AskMbin!

!AskKbin@kbin.social

Create post

### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 526

    Posts

  • 7.8K

    Comments

Community moderators