The move would extend her 36-year House career and continue to freeze her would-be California successors in a long-standing holding pattern.

187 points

As an unabashed liberal and Dem party voter: enough is enough. Let the future get started already.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

Same from a progressive/democratic socialist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

What exactly is a democratic socialist? I ask this as an anarchist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Socialism within a democracy as opposed to say socialism within a dictatorship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This doesn’t seem like a bad faith question at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points

Then you will be glad to know that you can run against her in her district.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

I’m not moving to California, but I do hope someone who already lives there will do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

She does fairly well in her district so don’t hold your breath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
124 points

She is too old to run again. Like Biden, Trump, many others passed retirement age. Let go of power and enjoy your retirement.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Always nice when all my reps are backwards boomer jackasses that don’t make any attempt to represent me or my generation. I wish all congresspersons be forced to retire and prevented from reelection when they reach a certain age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Hell, Gen X barely have any representatives. Boomers still run the place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Meh, we don’t bother to run. We got kneecapped as far as us being leaders is concerned, being bookended by two much larger generations.

I’m only even considering running for city council in 26 because several of my neighbors have suggested I do so independently of each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Always nice when all my reps are backwards boomer jackasses

Nancy Peloso is older than a Boomer. She’s from the generation before that, the Silent Generation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Silent indeed. If fucking only.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Imagine all the people,

Living for today.

Imagine your representatives,

Voting for term limits to cut off their own money faucets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Term limits just give corporations more power because you’re limiting experience. Corporate funded Special Interest Groups will be writing all the laws if you impose term limits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Yeah she’s 83 years old and could be worth $170 million. I think a normal person at some point would just want to take it easy a live their life for a bit. IMO it’s kind of ghoulish to have all these 70+ year olds still power-tripping just for the sake of it.

Like Strom Thurmond, who left the Senate in 2003 at 100 years old, and then pretty much died immediately afterwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Pretty sure most of these people would die immediately after retiring. Their thirst for power keeps their body working or something. That’s the only reasonable explanation of why in the flying fuck an 80 year old multimillionaire would choose to continue working.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh, I thought their longevity was due to the adrenochrome. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have employees who are way past retirement age and could have retired financially ages ago, but they really like what they do and they worry they’d just get bored sitting at home.

I’m nearing retirement, and I’m going to actually do it, but part of that is that I committed to my wife that I would and we’d go off and do stuff. Still, I honestly understand why some people don’t. I could easily live another 25 years, and my job really keeps my juices going. Some days I don’t want to get up and go to work, but the thought of never going in again is daunting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Imagine being so rich you can go do whatever you want for the rest of your days, and choosing more work. Wtf?! What is wrong with these people? I’d be kicking it on a beach if I had their money and was retirement age

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

McConnell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s the thing. People in power never let go voluntarily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You know what’s funny, George Washington, the OG, did. Wish they could follow his example since we’re all taught to masturbate our rock-hard patriotism to the founding fathers in school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

With someone like Feinstein, I think the argument against them is that their age has reduced their ability to do their job effectively. Pelosi still seems pretty effective to me for what she tries to do. My issue with her is that she’s not very progressive. You could make an argument that that’s a function of age, but Bernie Sanders, who also seems effective but is for sure progressive, is 82.

I’ve never had a problem with someone doing any job at any age as long as they are effective. I manage a software engineering team, and my best, sharpest developer - the one most everyone goes to for help - is around 80. He loves what he does and my whole team is better with him on it. I’ve known other people who declined at a much earlier age.

So I hate setting an artificial age limit, but I wish we had some kind of test out performance measure that would force people out who can’t do the job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

How else would she get all those hot stock tips?

permalink
report
reply
62 points
*

How much is enough for these people? I have always told myself if I won the lottery, I could live comfortably on 10 million no problem for the rest of my days with my wife and kids. What causes these people to just want more and more instead of just chilling out and enjoying what they have already? Why would you want to run again at her age? Go enjoy retirement!

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

When some old lady is found with a house full of junk from floor to ceiling we call that a mental disorder. When rich folk do the same with money it’s just capitalism at work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Narcissism, mainly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

For them, too much is not enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

For some it is never, ever enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
93 points

I live in her district. I will attend campaign speeches yelling, “Let younger generations have a turn!”

permalink
report
reply
-29 points

I also live in her district and will be voting for her again. Her incredible record of making high return investments shows good judgment that I just can’t argue with, even if she is more of a radical leftist than I’m normally comfortable with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Her incredible record of making high return investments

Just to be sure, we’re talking about her insider trading, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

He’s a parody account, talking as a Business man. The downvotes are either people who don’t get it, or don’t think it’s funny. Though I generally ignore not funny instead of downvoting it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Don’t feed the trolls

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

She isn’t inside the companies so it isn’t insider trading. She’s only inside Congress and there aren’t any laws against having stocks while you’re in Congress

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

record of making high return investments shows her good judgement

she is more of a radical leftist than I’m normally comfortable with

Lmao what the fuck dude? She’s a neoliberal, which is absolutely not aligned with “radical leftism” (a label that she absolutely, categorically does not fit). And her investment success just shows that insider trading is an effective strategy, nothing more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

I’ve seen her do some pretty radical leftist type stuff, she once did the outrageous Kaepernick kneel inside the Congress building

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Everyone getting wooshed here even down the the name

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points
*

Why. I’m asking because blindly yelling is pretty stupid and ineffective. Almost counter productive as you look ineffective and by proxy whatever you’re yelling about would look childish

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My dude, you’ve been wooshed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Fawking dead

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Will these stubborn old fucks just retire and disappear into wine country or something? You are creating a world you won’t have to deal with the consequences of and the longer you hold onto power the less experience the next generation of leaders can attain and will ultimately weaken your party and has already weakened the country. Go. The. Fuck. Away. You. Old. Cunts.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 471K

    Comments