152 points

Anybody still putting money into this is a sucker. For 50mil they should have had some game out and ready

Fuck, the entire time SC was worked on we had Elite Dangerous get funded, released expanded and crash and burned. No man’s sky launched from being “Sean Lied People Died” to the biggest redemption story in gaming and Starfield went from a twinkle in Todd Howards eye to complete. Two Everspace games. Rebel Galaxy 1&2. X4!! Fuck me.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Exactly. Star Citizen has been in development so long that not only have other developers already had the chance to jump in ahead of them, the genre’s brimming with games now!
They had such an advantage going into this, how do you fuck up a golden ticket so badly??

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

They’ve made $600M. How is that fucking up a golden ticket? They’ve all been getting paid well for years. The people who spent money are the ones who don’t have a finished game. That probably doesn’t matter to the people who’ve paid off a large chunk of their mortgages in the meantime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure, they’ve got money from all the good will they’re soaking up, but at some point that good will and money will dry up…

If/when they finally do release a game, it’s now got to not just compare to a whole full genre of games, it’s got to be better than them in order to get that good will back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

By singing and dancing with grandpa for 12 years and never actually cashing in the ticket?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Since backing SC I’ve met my wife, got married and had three children. Two of which are already going to school. It’s crazy how much you can accomplish in 13 years. I wonder if the game will be done before my oldest turns 18.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Your grandchildren will appreciate when the game finally hits 1.0.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Wasn’t dwarf fortress developed for 20 years before seeing steam release? Maybe SC could top it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The difference is that Dwarf Fortress only released on Steam because they had financial worries due to some health scares. They decided to release it on steam and charge for it but they wanted to deliver a major overhaul of the UI to justify selling it, even though people wanted to pay them for years.

DF has been in development for 20 years but it’s essentially a full game that they’ve been making better. Yeah it’s buggy (they simulate so goddamn much of course it’ll have bugs), but it’s at least a full experience that you can replay many times and never have the same experience.

Star Citizen does not deliver a full game, it’s just a glorified tech demo. It’s cool tech, but it’s not worth playing in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Dwarf fortress was released and being distributed and successful before steam existed, the recent release was to attain more financial security as the devs age and have to deal with medical bills related to aging, failing bodies

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What happened to Elite Dangerous? I used to play quite a bit before I had to move and ended up on horrible internet. I’ve finally got good internet but haven’t gotten back into it yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Wait… They actually made logging out something you need to do in order to complete objectives?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

One thing the others didn’t mention: They released a multilayer expansion, if you try to play in co-op the game crashes, they announced they wouldn’t fix the issue so they basically wasted resources on developing a game mode that doesn’t work and still made it a selling point.

Fuck em.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Last I played, the arc was humans attempted firing a weapon targeting Thargoids and it failed. Thargoids got mad and attacked human systems in the bubble.

There was also some unhappiness around their spacelegs expansion and the subsequent end of development for console versions. I stopped playing since then not because of any problems but because I got into other games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was on Xbox (where my friends were). Once Odyssey flopped they cancelled any new updates to the console versions and after a couple of years haven’t No Man Sky’d Odyssey yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A shit update, bad handling by the devs and complete refusal to listen to the player base. So, the things that usually plague big games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Starfield went from a twinkle in Todd Howard’s eye to complete

“complete”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Technically. Haven’t played it myself to judge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

DAE Starfield bad??

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

I was an original backer, I’ve played various iterations over the years and it really takes a lot of rose tint to find the game as it is enjoyable. The core loop isn’t even in place yet. The systems that do exist and work are interesting, the graphics and aesthetics are top notch, in parts, and at times it feels like we’re going to get something revolutionary. But then you play for a while and the unfinished jank gets to you, it’s not very fun. It’s cool, it’s impressive, the scope is insane and you can get lost in the vastness of space in ways that other games just can’t even approach. But it’s not fun. You can make it fun with friends or by setting up your own goals disjoined from the gameplay loop. Like try and jump a vehicle into the cargo bay mid flight or see how tightly you can race around asteroids. But if you just play the existing little loops it sucks. This is of course my subjective opinion. You might love the bounty system and the combat. You might love the salvage runs and transport missions but to me it’s like Euro Truck Simulator which is about the most boring shit I can imagine. And both the space and ground combat just isn’t even remotely as good as other games that just focus on that, which is understandable but I’m always left with this feeling of “will I really enjoy the finished product?” And I’m not sure. The game they said they were going to make in the Kickstarter, that game I would’ve enjoyed. I loved Chris Roberts games as a kid, but this monstrosity it has become? I just don’t know.

That said I really do believe they’re trying to make the best game ever. They just don’t fundamentally understand why we need deadlines and a fixed scope to get things out the door.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Star Citizen is the poster child for scope creep.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yup, this would’ve been much better solved with expansions. Just get the core loop solid, and then build on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Duke Nukem Forever enters the chat

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Did its scope creep…? I thought it just circled a drain until it finally plopped out in to a gutter somewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Truer words have never been spoken

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I feel the same way. For the 30 or so dollars I spent as an early backer I’ve actually had some fun times in the game, and I don’t actually think it’s quite the total loss that people make it out to be, but it certainly should be far, far better than it is after a decade and 600m dollars invested in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

That number is mind boggling. I can’t believe how much some are willing to spend on this “game”.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

They cater to a special subset of “core gamers” and those people have ample funds to blow on their hobby.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

It costs 35 bucks. Don’t listen to the liars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
-11 points

Almost all my ships are in game and flyable. But whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Ship insurance purchasable through in game currency yet?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There is no need to do so. “Currently, on the Alpha and Public Test Universe (PTU), all ships and vehicles are given a basic insurance plan that does not expire to facilitate testing. At this time, it requires no upkeep or fee for players to acquire basic ship loss coverage.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Anyone who has donated to that in the last 5 years is an idiot.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

I bought it for a short time. They have a 30 day policy.

I returned it within the week. Its just way too buggy. I dont even care about the pay to play ships, whatever.

But the bugs with missions was awful. The NPC/AI fighting is nonexistant. The flight characteristics were better with n64’s star fox 64. Its just not even close to being there.

Im a sucker for space games. If i want a flight sim ill play elite. If i want a space legs discovery game, ill play starfield. If i want to get stoned and look at weird animals with small heads and cool colors, ill fire up no mans sky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you want to have fun blasting ships in space try Everspace 2 (very close gameplay to freelancer)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

You pledged to an early alpha and then complain when it’s alpha? Shock

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No I purchased a game has releases going back to 2018 in 2023 and has raised over 600 million in capital.

Then returned it when basic functionality was broken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The game has been ongoing since at least 2011 because that’s when I first heard about it and the Kickstarter was going.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Idiot here. Put in 40€. Skeptical before I put in the money. But I liked the vision and had some friends that liked the game. Played for maybe 40 hours. Had a lot of fun with it. And a bit less fun when it crashed right in a mission. That was 3 years ago. Haven’t touched it since. Maybe I’ll get into it again to check it out. But no hopes for it being completed

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Of I understand you right that’s 1 € per hour. If you enjoyed those hours then that’s a pretty good return. Enjoy

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The first (and last) time I put in money was in the crowdfunding days. In fact, I did it so early they weren’t even using Kickstarter for funding.

Even though the current alpha is very buggy, I also more than got my money’s worth over the many, many years. I really would like to see the game get finished. But, what’s already there is really impressive.

The game has missed every possible deadline, and there’s every chance it will never be finished. But, the one comforting fact is that it’s missing the deadlines because they’re being too ambitious. Like, they redid the game engine to use 64 bit precision instead of 32 bit because they want it to be possible to drop a wrench at some random spot on the surface of a planet, and have another player fly across the solar system, go to the right spot, and see a wrench sitting there.

I wouldn’t put any more money in today, but I’m still glad I helped fund the game, and because I’ve been able to keep from adding more money, I actually consider my money well spent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I bought the cheapest version a few years ago. Turns out that the game was a tech demo, but a very glorious tech demo. Flying near the cities, to the atmosphere, in space, all were very beautifully done.

As a game, pretty much a failure though. As a money vacuum, pretty good.

I think it was a positive experience as a whole, though. Never experienced anything similar since or before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

Is this article written by AI? It has all sorts of strange errors and repeated words. Like the sentence at the end of this paragraph. I know it is popular to call out everything as AI right now but this article is suspicous.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

There is a wierd amount of generative-learning articles on game/tech Lemmy. I keep seeing these articles from publications that I’ve never heard of and I get excited because “Oo new people in the space” then halfway through the article I feel duped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Came in to criticise the writing too. Got AI or at least bad translation vibes. Really hard to follow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

AI has gotten to the point where it probably wouldn’t make these mistakes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You’ve never seen ChatGPT break I assume. It can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Never ask it for advice on anything technical. It is confidently incorrect about a LOT of things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

AI was at that point few months back. The quality is getting worse with each week now

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

Community stats

  • 6.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 76K

    Comments

Community moderators