That’s it. It’s just the fastest springboard this garbage company had to get yet another social media platform out the door when they sensed blood in the water.

Edit: This is a response to people who think FB users will somehow discover the fediverse and be converted by this action. They won’t.

Or that FB has noble goals in choosing AP or will somehow be forced to be better. They won’t.

It’s just good software.

53 points

creates open protocol standard

Oh no! People are using it!

permalink
report
reply
5 points

people is fine. meta - no fucking way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s not how open protocols work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well I mean xmpp and SMTP have been BASTARDIZED by corpos… Sooooo yeah, no fuck meta

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Truth.social did the same. It’s essentially a standalone mastodon instance with hate built-in.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

I think it’s cool, the internet needs to go the way of decentralised stuff, no matter which way it goes about it. Just because a big company has gone and done it doesn’t mean it’s an ultimately bad thing to happen. At the very least, this is a gateway for people to understand other activitypub services.

“Mastadon is just like Threads but with no big company behind it or ads…” Kind of thing.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I think that many people worry about what Meta might be able to do wih all the data that they can access, and we don’t know what they will do with it. We don’t know what a Mastodon instance admin might do with the data either, but Meta has much more resources to use them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And what stops meta from getting your data now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Yeah if they wanted to scrape the fediverse it wouldn’t be hard for them, and threads wouldn’t even be necessary to do that

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

For me, it’s not so much about what they can do now, but what they will do in the future.

I’m not a very technical person (at least in this field). But I’m infinitely distrustful of anything Meta does and I consider it hubris if we think we’re safe with the implementations we have now. They’re talented and ruthless at what they do; making money out of you, whether you want to or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Nono, as a mastodon user what i see there is mainly a concern bout they EEE’ing the fediverse

Oh you said many people, yeah i guess that’s true too

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Meta can access your data on the fediverse without thread federating though, they can just make a scraper if they really wanted to, and it wouldn’t be hard, literally an afternoons worth of code.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Yeah, just like big companies like Google use email protocols with Gmail. It’s actually good for adoption. The alternative is that FB uses its own proprietary and competing protocol, making everything more fragmented.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

The alternative is that FB uses its own proprietary and competing protocol, making everything more fragmented.

Oh, so Bluesky

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What it sounds like is that we need other big players so that one of them can’t taint the protocol with proprietary extensions

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The only “good” thing would be more contributors but I sure af dont’ want to be federated with them.

permalink
report
reply

sh.itjust.works Main Community

!main@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Community stats

  • 963

    Monthly active users

  • 432

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments