The Senior Tory MP has called on both the government and Labour to show courage and admit that Brexit has failed

10 points
*

Staying in the single market for goods was one of the brexit options that no one got to vote on, aka the Norway model, that would have prevented the vast majority of brexit issues

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

Staying in the single market for goods would have certainly helped with many of the logistical issues business and consumers have faced due to Brexit. But remember that the UK/EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement has at least allowed for tariff-free and quota-free trade in goods since Brexit - not as good as the single market, but at least not the worst possible outcome for goods trade.

The UK, however, is a service-based high-skill economy. From a growth and employment and competitiveness perspective, it’s trade in the service sector (and ultimately re-entry to the single market for services) that is the big prize we need to shoot for - where the Brexit agreement fell woefully short and which the Tories seemed clueless about the importance of it in the negotiations.They invested huge amounts of political capital in fighting over arrangements for fishing (which accounts for less than 0.1% of the UK economy) but basically never went in to bat on services (which accounts for about 80%).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I assume services was left out because it’s the area where the UK has areas of competitive advantage like fintech, deeptech, life sciences etc.

The EU would have demanded dynamic alignment of regulations for any inclusion and that would negate any advantage that could be gained.

The first test will be AI regulation, the EU has opted for a horizontal approach whereas UK is going for a vertical one which has received a welcome response from the AI industry

https://datainnovation.org/2023/04/the-eu-should-learn-from-how-the-uk-regulates-ai-to-stay-competitive/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Competitiveness counts for little when there are barriers to our competitive service sector even selling their services in the EU.

Competitive in financial services? Doesn’t matter, as we don’t have passporting anymore, so British banks and insurers have to set up on-shore locally-regulated entities to sell their services in the EU.

Competitive in professional services? Doesn’t matter either, as there’s no longer any mutual recognition of professional qualifications.

Etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure, but there isn’t really a single market for many services even within the EU anyway. If you’re French, you can’t buy car insurance from Italy or have a German bank account. And those are the upper reaches of the services economy. It goes without saying that you can’t have a cross-border haircut or swimming lesson. The vast majority of services are extremely local by nature.

As for the City, there’s still plenty of Chinese and Arab money to launder so I’m sure they’ll be fine.

Btw, I say all this as a staunch remainer. Brexit was dumb, but it’s free movement and trade in goods where most of the effects are felt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you’re French, you can’t buy car insurance from Italy or have a German bank account.

They literally can and do. It’s just so seamless within the EU that people who aren’t interested may not even realise they’re dealing with a company from another EU country. Being able to sell services cross-border without extra requirements (on top of those applying EU-wide) is the whole point of the single market in services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Why doesn’t the EU stop doing protectionism and reform itself?

You can see what the problem is every time you see the EU cookie notice.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The cookie banners you see everywhere are an unintended consequence of GDPR, and new legislation is underway to make them less of a hassle. The intention of GDPR and it’s laws were 100% required and welcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

GDPR is an EU law, and cookie warnings existed before GDPR anyway, as a result of EU law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They also force you to use cookies if you don’t want to see them over and over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The law: You can’t collect data without consent
The intent: Sites stop collecting data without consent
Sites interpretation: So I ask for consent right? right??

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How much influence does this guy have?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

He’s a fairly high profile Tory backbencher and respected enough for his fellow Tories to have elected him as chair of the defence select committee.

He’s not going to change government policy but the fact Tories like him will speak out on this is the sort of thing that will hopefully lower the bar to other sensible Tories starting to find their voices again. It’s always easier putting your head above the parapet if someone else has done it first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Should’ve never left

permalink
report
reply
-19 points

The EU is a corrupt totalitarian regime run by banks for their own benefit. The reason we have private finance initiatives which force public services to pay high interest rates is because of EU laws preventing borrowing from central banks.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

Sigh. You’d have thought the Wagner Group troll farms would be busy with other things at the moment…

permalink
report
parent
reply

UK Politics

!uk_politics@feddit.uk

Create post

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don’t post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.1K

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments