Unity executives sold thousands of shares in the weeks leading up to last night’s hugely controversial announcement it will soon charge developers when one of their games is downloaded.

The company has subsequently softened its stance slightly on a couple of aspects - but fury across the industry remains.

Behind the scenes, CEO John Riccitiello shifted 2000 shares last week on 6th September, as noted by Yahoo Finance, which noted this move was part of a trend over the past year where the exec has sold more than 50,000 shares in total and bought none.

2 points

CEO runs his business like a business that makes him money. This and more at 10.

permalink
report
reply
87 points

This isn’t insider trading?

permalink
report
reply
49 points
*

My friend told me about this earlier and that’s exactly what I thought. They knew this wouldn’t be popular and would drop the value so they sold before the announcement, that’s got to be insider trading

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Now the share price will drop and he will buy his share back at a discount. Then they will revert the policy and share prices will rise. Boom! Free monies!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

He’s actually sold over 50,000 shares and not bought any. It’s just unloading.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Read even the text posted in the OP. They’ve been selling all year, likely due to being paid in stock.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think the part where they had a trend of selling over the course of a year makes this not insider trading (or harder to prove if they were playing the long game).

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

They probably have automated sell of dates or automated sell of prices.

This is part of a consistent pattern over the last year.

He probably hasn’t bought any stocks due to receiving stock as part of his employment contract.

It could be insider trading, but considering how companies have been doing pricing structures and rapid shifts from free to subscription based and then seeing sales/profit increase I imagine it’s worth it for them to simply keep the stock long term, but an initial sell off was put in place at a certain price. Sometimes there’s smoke and there’s fire, and sometimes it’s just simply the fumes of capitalism creating a system that’s uniquely imbalanced for everyone else, but isn’t really insider trading.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Not if it is an automated scheduled sell and reported to the SEC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I feel like a scheduled sell shouldn’t mean insider trading investigation is off the table.

Does it really matter if they decided to sell just before they devalue their company, or they devalued their company right after a sell? They knew about both before hand, and they can have the same intent either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I suppose, but that’s a different crime under a different statute Im guessing. (Tanking the company because gou have a scheduled sell, versus selling because you tanked the company.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’ve been consistently selling off stock for the last year as noted in the article. Many of these execs get paid in a combination of cash and shares. To get their full wage they sell shares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

According to the Form 4 filed with this sale, the trade was planned at least as of May 19 using a 10b5-1.

The sales reported on this Form 4 were effected pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan adopted by the Reporting Person on May 19, 2023.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1193857/000181080623000163/xslF345X05/wf-form4_169420518678431.xml

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No, as the article says they’ve been doing it all year. Many execs and important employees often get paid a big chunk of their wage in stock. To get cash they need to sell stock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The irony of a bunch software devs about to sue the shit out of Unity to get EULAs invalidated.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Riccitiello made EA the money guzzling shithole it is today. Who thought he might change when he was given the reigns of unity?

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Remember when he wanted to charge players per digital bullet fired in FPS games?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Nobody at Unity expected him to change. It was the entire point that this shit heel got to helm the company. The three founders are billionaires now, that’s why. Two years ago one of the founders, Joachim Ante, sold $40million in stock. They dgaf anymore they just keep selling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Curious to see if he actually buys any of it back, then that’s an issue. Pump stock and sell high, tank it to buy low.

permalink
report
reply

Games

!games@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

Community stats

  • 6.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 80K

    Comments

Community moderators