84 points

“China bad. They built a train station.”

lol

permalink
report
reply
54 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

“They’re doing the environment good but for all the wrong reasons. The unmitigated greed is dizzying.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

“Oh sure public transit is easy when you’re not exclusively doing it for profits!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Bazinga LED car tunnels are more morally pure because the stated intent is technology rapture!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Xi Jinping wants to rely less on coal because it’s profitable. Elon Mungus wants to transition to electric vehicles because he cares deeply about my well being, and he wants to reward my love for him. That’s the difference between the demonic communists and capitalists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Noooooo you can’t make poor rural areas less dependent on cars, it is not profitable!

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Noooooo you can’t make poor rural areas less dependent on cars, it is not profitable!

I had a turbolib make that argument about their sacred holy pallets. Yeah, pallets. “How is your socialist mass transit going to move my pallet?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

You build a high speed rail endpoint somewhere, and development will happen there. That’s what I always point out.

That’s why dense populations are always on rivers, because you can transport things along them easily. Trains are the same more or less.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s easier to build infrastructure before people are living there en masse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

O fukk, a railway is a lot like a metallic river

permalink
report
parent
reply

Theres people in there saying that China botched “its transition to capitalism” worse than Russia lol

Yea China’s economy is fked which is why they’re the biggest economy rn

They literally cannot say a single good thing about china to the extent they would rather deny reality lmao

permalink
report
reply

They believe inframaterialism is real but also that’s bad because it means the hiveminded asians can succeed despite not following the rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply

If we post enough china will collapse in 20 hours videos maybe it manifest itself into reality

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

You’ll never outpost the Chinese, tho

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

China is always and forever the image from the 1980s where polluted slums are advertised as the legacy of Communism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I can’t believe the communists destroyed China like that. I’m sure China before 1949 was a thriving industrial powerhouse where everyone ate caviar and drank champagne!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The entire society twirled around fancy dance stage sets like in the cult propaganda treats!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I didn’t see that but I did see a comment saying that it is bad that china has a low cost of living because it “distorts the labor market”.

I am not going to subject myself to further brainworm exposure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Use /r/sino

permalink
report
reply
44 points

I always found it funny that they crap on China for empty developments not yet populated because westoids are only familiar with the same crumbling congested infrastructure with absolutely nothing new ever built because that means the property prices can’t be inflated exponentially.

Things tend to be empty when they’re first developed or in the process of being completed. Not that a westoid would know because they haven’t seen anything new in their lifetimes.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

In general Western infrastructure lags demand because the economic case doesn’t pass until demand ratchets up.

What’s missed is that lots of infrastructure induce demand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

the CCP has been good at pushing renewables, even though maybe they’re motivated by money instead of environmental reasons.

Where’s the evil?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

It’s not “their team” doing it. That’s it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

To a liberal, it is far more important to be “morally virtuous” and “pure” than it is to actually improve the world. So if China is deemed to have “impure” reasons for renewables, then it doesn’t count, and if the US “tries” to implement renewables, but fails, that’s ok, because they tried really hard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

but they’re not even applying this moral standard consistently, considering how these libs are all pro-capital and already think that financial incentive should govern all of industry

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Can’t find the relevant article unfortunately, so here’s a somewhat relevant one. https://redsails.org/brainwashing/

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Capitalist ideology in general, Žižek maintains, consists precisely in the overvaluing of belief – in the sense of inner subjective attitude – at the expense of the beliefs we exhibit and externalize in our behavior. So long as we believe (in our hearts) that capitalism is bad, we are free to continue to participate in capitalist exchange.

Capitalist Realism chapter 2

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Some of the most fucked up liberal logic is when some billionaire is nakedly greedy it is seen as “pure” because “gotta please the shareholders” but if a protestor wears brand-name shoes that’s seen as a moral failing for the protestor’s message.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s so stupid

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

I think they do the flip side of this too, where (AES country) tries to provide (good thing) but failed or was only partially successful then they suck and are bad and killed 100 million.

Then you have good strong (Capitalist country) doesn’t give a fuck about providing (good thing) and so when they fail to provide it that’s okay. It’s your fault for not getting it for yourself!

permalink
report
parent
reply

where (AES country) tries to provide (good thing) but failed or was only partially successful then they suck and are bad and killed 100 million.

For example:

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Nuance is for losers.

There are so many aspects of China that are awesome. There are also quite a few things that I don’t agree with or like. How hard is it to understand you can agree AND disagree at the same time?

The anti-china propaganda and other similar bullshit doesn’t help either. Hard for someone without that understanding to get over the hurdle of “bad thing” to support any good things.

I’m high AF and had a lot of trouble writing this. To summarize, if you believe China did a good then you can praise that. Even if you also believe they did a bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Nah, it’s fine, you’re making sense. The liberal worldview tries to fit everything into binary good/bad when the real world doesn’t exist like that. Any nation or group of people will do good things and bad things, liberals just ignore or justify the “bad things” their team does, while ignoring or denying all the good things the enemy team does.

It’s important for us to remember to actively reject this sort of mentality ourselves, it can be tempting to push back against liberal claims about China with a “China is actually perfect and an ideal place!” but that isn’t any more true than whatever liberal horror story about them is being pushed in the news this week. China is a nation like any other, with great accomplishments, but also errors and failures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s funny because this is what liberals believe in. Several times when you bring up how capitalists will fuck up “improvements” over their profit motive, they’ll reduce your concerns to “wow so some people make money, and that’s bad to commies.” I’m assuming this guy is a liberal because that sub is just conservatives and liberals circle jerking about how much they hate Chinese people

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.6K

    Posts

  • 94K

    Comments