10 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan said Menendez, 69, accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of cash and gold bars in exchange for using his power and influence as New Jersey’s senior senator to benefit the government of Egypt and interfere with law enforcement probes into the businessmen.

Menendez has been an important ally to fellow Democrat Joe Biden as the president has sought to reassert U.S. influence on the world stage, rally support for congressional aid to Ukraine, and push back against a rising China.

Prosecutors are seeking to have Menendez forfeit assets including his New Jersey home, a 2019 Mercedes-Benz convertible, and about $566,000 in cash, gold bars and funds from a bank account.

Damian Williams, the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, noted that Menendez’s website says that as a senator he cannot compel an agency to act in someone’s favor or influence matters involving a private business.

Federal prosecutors in New Jersey dropped a case in January 2018 in which Menendez was charged with accepting private flights, campaign contributions and other bribes from a wealthy patron in exchange for official favors.

In exchange, Hana, 40, put Nadine Menendez on the payroll of a company he controlled that had the exclusive right to certify halal meat shipped to Egypt from the United States, prosecutors said.


The original article contains 1,083 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
48 points

A D acting like an R.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

New Jersey. Whadya gonna do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Fucking dump him as fast as we’re allowed to. We don’t circle the wagons the way the GOP does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Right. If he’s guilty, he’s gotta go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The only way to make this more New Jersey is to add a jughandle

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

In general I agree, but this kind of corruption has become pretty normalized in Congress, I think.

Look at how many Senators and other congresspeople have become millionaires (or much, much wealthier) while in office. It’s not all insider trading - there’s so many special favors being done, “consulting fees” being paid to family members. Campaign “contributions” that find their way into pockets via thinly veiled (or deeply hidden) laundering, special payments/contracts for existing business interests, etc. I don’t usually go for “both sides” arguments but the kind of corruption is widespread. Even if the GOP seems to be doing it more.

I’m just really happy to see someone actually investigated and charged for a change. No matter which party. This kind of corruption needs aggressively stamped out everywhere, it should be in the top 3 priorities for our government.

But I’ll be amazed if it isn’t shut down like the last charges against this piece of garbage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Book deals are, imo, one of the main vehicles of money transfer. Get a ghost writer, publish a book, your friendly superPAC orders 100000, clean cash in your pocket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Bribery is perfectly legal as long as it goes though the right systems and they call it lobbying. Some one missed some paperwork.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

If you think this has to do with party you’re delusional.

They’re all doing it. Yes, even your favorite one. Every time they do this budget shutdown thing, what do you think they’re doing? Trying to get smaller government? Trying to reduce greenhouse gasses? No. They’re holding each other’s money makers over each other’s heads to get more of what they want.

Every time the president signs a 100k page omnibus bill into law, what do you think all those pages have in them? The omnibus bill is a free for all, where everyone crams some special interest of theirs in, complete with kickbacks, and holds the possibility of a government shutdown over everyone’s heads. Every single congressperson works for at least one special interest group. Some of those special interest groups are foreign nations. All of them, every single one, is selling the US down the river to line their own pockets. They’d sell you into slavery for a buck. They take their peanuts, live a decadent life, make their kids rich and hollow out this country for a living. Every single fucking one of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How are the two equivalent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The two what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It doesn’t have anything to do with party. That’s the point I was making.

Criminals are criminals and will join any political leaning that serves their personal goals best. Usually, the choice is ‘conservative’ simply because authoritarian parties tend to protect their own more readily than liberal leaning parties do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Money is really the engine of the political system and so many safeguards have been removed, then Citizens United just put a nail in it. It’s always been like this but the money involved is so much more significant then when the country was founded. It also corrupts the whole system including “good” actors. Look at someone like Fetterman and how he quieted up about Israel once he was in, he knows it will harm his political goals to make it an issue, so he is forced to comply to the Israel lobby. When things are so partisan even campaign dollar counts.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Well, this leads me to conclude that the only reason to get into politics is the money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Senators and Congress acting like Senators and Congress

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes, he’s a centrist. It’s what they do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
21 points

The only correct answer to his response is to start setting up the guillotine.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

It’s quickly becoming very clear, at least to me, that power will have to be taken back. These people will not give it up until they are met with deadly force. I absolutely do not condone violence because I feel it should always be the last option. At the rate power is being consolidated and our rights taken away it is looking like the only way to force a pause and possibly a disruption is to drag one of these CEOs/politicians/crazy religious zealot into the street and execute them in cold blood.

Again, I am not condoning violence but the ease in which civilian’s lives are being taken by law enforcement agencies and the like gives us very little recourse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Let’s take it to the Supreme Court - because I’m sure judge Clarance Thomas would have so much to say on receiving bribes and remaining in office…

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 427K

    Comments