6 points
*

Sad to hear this as null-ls is a main part of my config. Curious to hear what alternatives are there? I have seen this recommended by some people:

https://github.com/mfussenegger/nvim-lint

permalink
report
reply
2 points

https://github.com/nvimtools/none-ls.nvim

null-ls.nvim Reloaded, maintained by the community.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, I heard good things, I’ll probably migrate there soonish.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Good for him, I personally think null-ls should be a core functionality rather than a plugin.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Totally. Developing against internal APIs is always a pain and it takes a special kind of motivation to keep a project like this alive for as long as he has.

I can understand the core team as well though. Doing what null-ls is kind a nice in principle, but 90% of what people is it for can be done differently without hooking deep into the LSP client like that. I get why they don’t want to commit to opening those APIs for what seems to be mostly niche cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Bummer. It’s a key part of my config.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Tough news but fair enough from the author.

Let’s hope null-ls functionalities can be incorporated deeper into the core nvim lsp.

permalink
report
reply

Community stats

  • 56

    Monthly active users

  • 153

    Posts

  • 533

    Comments