1 point

The way I prefer to see it is whether we want to maintain the current “lifestyle” status quo. In the grand scheme of things we might look forward to the future we want for our grandchildren, but for the most part most people are more worried about taking care of what is good in society that we want to keep around.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

As last resort we can always trigger a nuclear winter. /s

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Thus solving the problem once and for all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

And there is no worry that it will destroy the planet either. Earth has already weathered hundreds of terrible catastrophic global level events in the past and has survived.

There is no real danger to the planet. This has all happened before.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

theres danger to life on the planet

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Sure, life that can adapt will. But that’s not the main concern. It’s the immeasurable and enormous potential loss of human life and every other innocent creature that people are morally concerned about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s the point I was trying to imply with my sarcastic first comment.

Climate change deniers always like to point out ancient prehistoric changes that occurred on earth thousands or even millions of years ago … and they are right.

What they seldom understand is that the earth can weather these unbelievable changes but life, especially human life can not.

I never worry about the planet. It will be around for about another billion years in one form or another. It’s always a question of whether or not any living thing will survive on it’s surface.

I was being stupid with my first comment and I don’t mind being stoned for it … I just wanted to point out that climate change is not a problem for the planet … it’s a problem for the survival of all human life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah, I didn’t catch the sarcasm! Poe’s law and all that

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s rather a red herring: the risk is to our ability to support nearly so many people as we have, rather than that we’ll shatter the Earth into tiny fragments like the Death Star attacking Alderaan

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

CO2 levels never were like that since humans existed. We don’t know how suitable a planet transformed this way is for human life.

There is exactly one planet in the known universe which can host humans, and we might be in the process of changing that. An experiment without backup.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

For anybody who hasn’t seen the graph of CO2 concentrations:

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Zack Labe has some great visuals: https://zacklabe.com/climate-change-indicators/

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.2K

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments

Community moderators