Old habits die hard, but there’s Reddiquette which needs to be revived, and some which needs to die.

Many “golden-age” redditors remember a time when downvoting was reserved for hostility, not a different opinion. For the sake of our growing community I would like to implore everyone to be awesome to each other.

However, this place is not Reddit.

  • We don’t measure in bananas here.
  • We don’t need to append “edit: typo” to edited posts and comments.
  • if you see something which is worthy of a downvote: down vote and move on! Don’t engage with it and feed the algorithm/engament machine so other people are exposed to it when sorting by active.
90 points

Showing the reason you edit a post isn’t dumb, its to give a valid reason so people don’t think you edited to make someones response look bad. Saying its for context, adding a word or whatever just shows you didn’t edit it maliciously.

The whole “edit: thanks for gold and I can’t believe my most upvoted comment was about editing!” can go away for sure though

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

Holy shit agreed. The “thanks for le kind gold stranger” shit makes me want to fucking cut my throat. Some shit im begging to stay on leddit. All the shit on /r/circlejerk for example.

Edit: le thanks for the gold kind stranger

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

This argument never really made sense to me. Anyone who is being deceptive is not going to tell people they’re editing their comments.

It’s the result of nothing more than a moral panic. There aren’t roving bands of keyboard warriors rolling around making comments and then editing them to make others look stupid.

And even if there were, they could just include “edit: typo” and get away with it. Unless someone takes screenshots.

I think it says more about the community that everyone is expected to prove their innocence. Let’s have a little faith in each other, we’re better than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

It makes sense to me and I’ve been editing comments this way since the early 2000’s. For some, it’s a cultural practice that’s probably decades old.

If the platform didn’t state the comment was edited, I probably wouldn’t bother but if it does, there is always a thought at the back of the reader’s mind about what happened. Leaving a note about editing negates the thought. Leaving pointless edits less so.

I find it more ethical and transparent, particularly in discussion threads where debates are being held.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I get it as a cultural thing, but it makes no sense epistemologically.

An unethical person would not state they changed their comment, and a malicious person would state their edit was mundane. Those two factors alone render the practice of proving your innocence in advance moot.

I think it’s sad that people reflexively assume the worst. I used to engage in some heated debates on Reddit, but I was never accused of, or assumed the other person edited their posts to make me look bad. It seems like paranoid behaviour to me.

Strangely enough, if it became the norm to correct typos without stating it, the default assumption would be that the edit was a typo correction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

I like the “edit:” append if I edited something, just to make it clear for whoever comes later.

What’s the problem with it?

permalink
report
reply
23 points

We don’t need to append “edit: typo” to edited posts and comments.

I didn’t do that because it was reddit etiquette. I did it because people can see I edited my post, and I would like them to be able to see why

permalink
report
reply
-2 points
*

Why tell them you fixed typos? What’s the point?

I’ve edited my comments for years to fix typos and clarify statments, and I never once had anyone accuse me of being disingenuous.

And even if they did, that’s their, and their conspiratorial mind’s problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Because otherwise people don’t know why I edited the post. Did I change my opinion? Did I add some context or detail I missed the first time around? Or did I just fix a typo? A reason just makes it easy for people to have more context

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That’s the thing though, it’s a paradox.

Anyone who is considerable enough to use “edit:” for legitimate reasons would not be the people who would be deceptive and change their posts to reflect a new opinion.

“edit: typo” is essentially just a defense against an imaginary accusation that you were being malicious.

By all means, edit posts to include extra information as an appendage, but closing with “edit: added info” is not very helpful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I think it’s polite to tell what you have changed when you edit a post as long as the platform does not have edit history visible (which as far as I can tell Lemmy does not).

permalink
report
reply
3 points

If you add more context to your comment then sure mention it. But I don’t think it’s required for typos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I rate this post 0.5 bannanasbananas. edit: typo

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

downvoted edit: wait I think I pressed the wrong button

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse

!fediverse@lemmy.ml

Create post

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of “federation” and “universe”.

Getting started on Fediverse;

Community stats

  • 1.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 939

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments