80 points

I can’t win the case, so give me a shot at pardoning myself once I’m president. --Trump

Not giving a defendant the chance to be president and pardon themselves is a miscarriage of justice! – His supporters

I am invoking the “I could be president” precedent, your honor. Please delay my trial until after the next election. – Guy arrested for being an idiot in a few months.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

He wasn’t being an idiot, he was committing crime.

When we laugh at him, you minimize how dangerous he was & is. He stole classified docs, probably sold state secrets, and endangered lives of US agents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The last hypothetical isn’t about trump. It’s a random person using the same defense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

it very well could have led to several deaths but its not the sort of thing that would even be publicised for obvious reasons

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Technicallly he was doing both

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

This judge will probably grant it, honestly. I imagine we’ll start seeing more rulings going Trump’s way in the future. She is so deep in Trump’s pocket it’s really not going to be a fair trial.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Yup. It’s part of why they stacked the courts. Republicans know a lot of the shit he does and has done so it’s their way to protect him as much as possible.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she throws it out on some obscure technicality that isn’t a technicality but she convinced herself it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The GOP didn’t start packing the courts just for Trump. It’s been their priority for decades. They know their agenda is not favorable to the average voter so they’ve been trying to govern via the courts, and what do you know, it’s worked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Good point. It’s their way of changing America from a democracy to a theocratic autocracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And it’s why they get people basically right out of law school. Quality of candidates don’t matter. Allegiance to the cult and being young is all they care about

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And it’s why they get people basically right out of law school. Quality of candidates don’t matter. Allegiance to the cult and being young is all they care about

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Oh yeah, and if that’s granted, he’ll probably ask for an extension until after the '28 elections.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

If he wins '24 I doubt there would be elections in '28

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fair

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

People in hell want ice water.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Fucking traitor.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 440K

    Comments