Maybe it is

70 points
*

Isn’t that basically how it works?

Just add an additional group of monkeys that aggressively hires and fires the others based on performance

Tada, machine learning

permalink
report
reply
10 points

It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times!

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

asks for password hashing

gets code that looks like password hashing, named like password hashing, but, without any of the hashing

permalink
report
reply
22 points

But it has better performance

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

hash-lite

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

but, without any of the hashing

Or it’s something like unsalted MD4.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

It generates the blurst of code!

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I’ve been using copilot and find it’s suggestions are perfectly cromulent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I turn to copilot whenever I need to embiggen my code

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Tbh, copilot was probably the worst AI coding experience I’ve had. It actually made me less productive and made me question my competency as a programmer at the same time. Straight up did not have a good time. Use Cody or GPT-4 instead.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

It is designed for other purposes than GPT models. Next time try to use copilot as autocompletion, not to generate new code. It’s excellent in that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That’s how I thought it was supposed to be used. It’s “copilot” not “autopilot”. I don’t need nor want it to write whole functions for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Company ran a trial for it, and it worked really well for generating boilerplate code following our existing system design. Sometimes it makes mistakes, but during the trial it was a rare occurence

The company is giving it to us all for free next year, hope it doesn’t negatively affect hiring though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s how I was using it; I ended up spending as much time as I was saving going around and cleaning up after it and/or second guessing myself. Basically, because it only operates in the context of the file you’re working in, it will suggest garbage half the time if you have to work with resources from other files.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

From the docs:

GitHub Copilot analyzes the context in the file you are editing, as well as related files

Tho, I don’t know if it allways been that way, maybe they added bigger context later

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you have those other files open, it also picks those up. And lately it seems to follow imports too, I feel like

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

But the propaganda from GitHub said it was making devs 80%+/- more productive!

How could this have happened? /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

it works well for me, mostly accurately guesses what I am trying to do, helps a ton with boilerplate code

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It was 55% for me. Higher baseline I suppose. <\s>

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Because we are the apes that wrote the code that copilot read.

permalink
report
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 35K

    Comments