Thoughts?

105 points
*

Fairphone proves the usual excuses for ending Android support aren’t valid.

That alone is worth a lot. Their endeavour for longevity is also great. I hope they get the attention they need.

permalink
report
reply
-3 points
*

By supporting the very manufacture to blame for short support times? Qualcomm is the root of the problem.

They don’t provide the bloody drivers for newer Android versions.

Manufacturers can only provide security updates after 2 major updates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Are other Chipmakers better? It’s not like they could just have no chip at all…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Ok, than they are alright and green, very fair much phone

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

I bought my Fairphone 3 at the start of 2020. I love it. I love the fact I can dissamble it with the provided screwdriver in two minutes.

I love that I can buy replacement parts for it if anything breaks without having to get some kind of expensive repair from Apple or Samsung. Ive replaced the charging port on this phone and I’ll be replacing the battery soon too. Giving people the ability to fix and maintain their own devices is fantastic.

I am hoping to get a decade out of this device and I’m nearing 4 years with no complaints so far. I’m a little bit dissapointed they got rid of the headphone jack on the Fairphone 4. While you can get adapters etc, it shouldn’t be necessary imo. That alone is my biggest gripe with that device. Aside from that though, they make great devices and I highly reccomend them

permalink
report
reply
0 points

The removal of the headphone jack is what made me call complete bullshit on their whole “repairability and sustainability” schtick. At the same time of the removal, they began selling their own wireless earbuds. So now you can’t use wired headphones with their phones, and instead have to buy a pair of wireless ones (which they conveniently sell to you) which will eventually have their internal batteries die and need to go to a landfill because none of it is repairable. I initially thought they were a pretty good company with decent values, but ever since they did that I no longer care about them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah that was a disappointing moment. Though I think you can still use wired headphones with an adapter that connects them to USB-C.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I disagree with this choice, but I don’t think they are bullshiting, I think they are walking a difficult line of trying to be sustainable, up to date with the technology (adding 5G this early is also very questionable IMO), attractive for consumers and not completely unaffordable, which leads to difficult compromises.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

None of those points demand the removal of the headphone jack as a compromise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well, when I ordered my FP4 last year the wireless earbuds were included for free. Still bought an adapter for aux that i keep in my car. I think this is fairly acceptable. Now my only problem is that they didn’t offer an adapter with both aux and USB for charging.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s still more waste. An adapter is a bigger use of materials, extra cost, and another point of failure. Hardly a sound decision for a self-proclaimed “sustainable” manufacturer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wireless is future

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

This is really good to hear. The worst thing about mid range android phones is the lack of future software support. Even flagship androids aren’t anything to write home about. As much as people like shitting on apple, they support their devices for quite a while compared to other manufacturers.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Most Android manufacturers are using minimal development teams to get closed source blobs from the CPU+radios OEMs to talk to the OS. Like the article says, Qualcomm stop supporting older generations of their SoCs pretty quickly, and those manufacturers don’t invest the resources in custom development, which is the LineageOS approach that Fairphone are taking. There’s nothing to promise these updates will be stable and secure though.

Apple has a huge advantage in developing their own processors from start to finish. They’re not reliant on anyone else’s code, and if they do need to buy in certain components (like Intel modems that they’ve used before), they’ve got the size and budget to get pretty much anyone to agree to their terms. It’s why Google started the Tensor project, which is rumored to be finally going full Google (ending reliance on Samsung) from 2025/Pixel 9.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I still think that open standards would better enable long-term support than more effective vertical integration.

We need an open source smartphone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Good explanation. Even if their long term support doesn’t work out it’s nice to see a trend towards long term support and reduction of e-waste.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

So? Sell it and buy the new one

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Believe it or not, some people aren’t big on over consumption and want things to last. Companies should do better and not produce crap that’s going to end up in landfill in a few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Have fun using obsolete tech

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I wanted to get a Fairphone 4 until I saw I saw it didn’t have a headphone jack. Made me think all their “sustainable” mottos are just marketing.

Purism with their Librem phones took people’s money and didn’t send them the product so I didn’t want to chance it or support a company that does that.

So in the end I got a Pixel 7 instead and put Graphene OS on it. Not particularly happy but didn’t seem like there was a better choice.

Recently found out from a Louis Rossman video that the lead dev of Graphene has some mental health issues that don’t make him a very trustworthy individual. Supposedly he stepped down but he’s probably still contributing code.

Tl;dr: phones = bad

permalink
report
reply
28 points

His code contributions have always been high quality, and they’re audited by his peers. Its very unlikely malicious code would come from him, and even more unlikely it would make it through on to your phone.

While he’s certainly unhinged, it’s clear that he cares deeply for the project. I can’t see him doing anything intentionally malicious.

I really wish him the best, and I’m glad he stepped down. Much better for optics with him out of the way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The risk is definitely not higher than the risk of some closed sorce dev smuggling something dodgy into a high profile project like e.g. Windows.

That said, I would trust an unknown git repo about as much as I would trust some exe I found on a random website.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yup, I’m in the market for a new phone soon, and here’s my assessment of my options, in rough order of preference:

  • PinePhone Pro - probably not ready since I’m not confident in calls waking it from sleep; not sure if it’ll support the apps I need (mostly need a specific 2FA app for work)
  • Fairphone - expensive and no headphone jack
  • Pixel + alternate ROM - not sure I trust the devs
  • iPhone - don’t like the ecosystem much, and I don’t really trust Apple
  • regular Android - software support ends too soon
  • feature phones - don’t have the apps I need

I’m probably going to get an older Pixel and a PinePhone Pro, and I’ll hack on the PinePhone until it does what I need. I don’t think I can add reliable suspend/resume, but I can probably build a couple small apps I need (i.e. a lemmy client, I’m already working on one), get a few Android apps working, and tune the OS a bit. Worst case scenario, it’s a fun hobby project.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Owner of PinePhone(Pro), calls and alarm from sleep works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Which distro and enviornment do you use and how is your battery experience?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I heard the original PinePhone works fine, but the Pro is still WIP. I want the extra performance from the Pro, otherwise I’d probably already have a PinePhone.

I guess I’ll find out when I get one though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fairphone allows you to remove the battery, which, amongst other things, allows you to hard-reset the phone by just pulling the battery, which I did 2 times after owning the FP4 for 18 months. It also receives longer software support than most other phones. Negatives include a rattly top speaker above 50% volume, which was confirmed to be a design defect, the high price tag and, for me at least other small annoyances, such as the microphone volume being pretty low when on a call (not unusable, but you got to speak louder) and sometimes GPS issues, which either require patience or a restart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

An incredibly important detail of being able to remove the battery is that it enables both carrying extras for longer travel, and allows replacing and upgrading as it ages.

I have a samsung galaxy s5 and thanks to that i could straight up double the ontime with an aftermarket battery, which is comically large and came with a new backside lmao.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

pinephone pro - is defintely getting better as the software improves. The battery life is definitely something that holds it back i bought a keyboard battery case and it improved it however the edges of the case that connects to the phone have cracked over time and ive super glued it twice (near headphone port & opposite side near type c port.) When they crack it can cause a misalignment on the pins and not charge/keyboard doesnt function so i have to press back into the case(hence the glue to fix that). It will eventually get better for me to completely jump over.

Pixel phones degoogled - works great especially calyx or graphene os. I have always bought used but if i want change to happen i need to stop funding google indirectly through the used market with buying their phones. I am speaking for myself here.

Fairphone , Teracube, Murena - i eventually want to just buy from these moving forward. They hit 80% + of the checkboxes i need and improvements come quicker when this companys market improves especially when their direction aligns with what i want in a phone.

Tl;dr - i am letting my money do the talking on where i want phone improvement to occur.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think my problem is that I don’t know where I want to see improvement. I see two options:

  • Linux phone - it’ll become a hobby and I’ll constantly need to tinker
  • Graphene, Fairphone, etc - better than what I have, but I’ll probably never get to my ideal

If the PinePhone had better software, I’d totally just go with that, but it’ll be rough the first couple of years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Oneplus6 + postmarketos

It works really, really well.

https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/OnePlus_6_(oneplus-enchilada)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Any idea of what phone is best for postmarketos? I intend to use it as a daily driver and potentially submit patches for things like MMS (my family still uses it occasionally).

I guess, if money were no object, which phone offers the best postmarketos experience?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The pixel also doesn’t have a headphone jack, so the fairphone is still better in that it has an ethical supply chain, and much more user repairable

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

When I heard the Fairphone 4 didn’t have any waterproofing I decided to skip this version. My coworker is replacing their Samsung S10 just because the USB port is getting loose but they’re an avid boater. For some, water resistance really matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I would assume it’s very hard to build a phone that’s easily openable and at the same time waterproof :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

S5 was both.

Plus you could just use screws and a gasket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I would like to support them, but it is lacking in several features. Kinda wish they would take their modular and user-replaceable components and let us upgrade, like a better camera module for example.

that said, it’s missing the most important thing… Network compatibility.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

I wish they were more similar to Framework except in the smartphone space. Because when I buy a Fairphone I’m still stuck with the specs I bought and when I want to have better specs I need to buy a new phone regardless of how repairable it is. WIth a Framework laptop I can upgrade the mainboard to one with better specs and can keep the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Boy do I have a phone for you!

Fairphone.com

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Your example with the camera module is exactly what happened to the FP3. They released the FP3+ which featured a better camera and users of the original model could upgrade by just buying this module.

However this is definetly not the focus of Fairphone as a company as too many or regular new modules would introduce new e-waste again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

the fairphone 5 is rumored to come out this year, hopefully it will address those issues

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 45K

    Comments

Community moderators