BagelEmbezzler

It is the words “toilet paper” repeated over and over to whatever tune comes to mind

I always have to sing the toilet paper song through the whole process

You would think so wouldn’t you? But Google usually still tries to be “helpful” about everything. “100 linen” does work better, although still not perfect.

That also doesn’t fix the issue with being unable to ignore Amazon and Walmart. On the standard search, the dash to ban a specific term makes it not the first result but it still shows up further down the page. On the dedicated product search it doesn’t seem to do anything at all.

Here’s an example of how well search operators do these days.

I just signed up for the free trial of Kagi, I’ll have to see how it compares.

It’s even bad for finding something to purchase honestly. I’ll search for a specific part number, and most of the results are other similar but not interchangeable products. No Google I cannot just shove this random other battery pack into my UPS, but thanks anyway.

I tried searching for airtight drawers and all the results were either airtight or drawers. Only one was both and it was a ten thousand dollar museum specimen cabinet.

It’s especially terrible if you care about the fiber content of your clothes. Searching for linen or even 100% linen gets me linen blend, linen-look, linen color. 100% wool gets mostly acrylic wool blends. Wool toe socks gets me either wool socks or toe socks but again, not both.

Plus I can’t block Amazon and Walmart from the results anymore, so that’s a ton of extra junk to filter through manually.

Man I can haul 3 2x4s in my Camry

There’s !darkbrandon@lemmy.world

Edit - how do I link it

I was not expecting that title to be so literal

I keep seeing articles refer to them as “a university” or “Prager University” lately, what’s up with that? I thought they were officially PragerU because as a media outlet they’re not allowed to call themselves a university, but the U implies it enough to lend credibility.

Are these writers just taking the bait? Or did PragerU finally realize you don’t have to follow the law if you’re rich and conservative?

I get why a lay person would misunderstand the capabilities of LLMs. They sound like a thinking person should sound, so they treat it like it’s coming from a thinking person.

But how are all the (presumably) tech-literate Microsoft employees also confused by this? Anyone paying even a little attention should have seen numerous instances of LLMs confidently asserting “facts” that they pulled out of their asses. They are not the right tool for most of the stuff people use a voice/OS assistant for.

I have to assume it’s the business guys up top hearing the “AI” buzzword and getting horny for capitalism but god damn

Awesome, thanks so much!