![User's banner](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemm.ee%2Fapi%2Fv3%2Fimage_proxy%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Flemmy.world%252Fpictrs%252Fimage%252Fdb78e1ac-58b3-4a0c-b3cf-2bc056709808.jpeg&w=2048&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemm.ee%2Fapi%2Fv3%2Fimage_proxy%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Flemmy.world%252Fpictrs%252Fimage%252Fbc176644-c62c-4760-ba4e-4b6ecf45869e.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
Blackbeard
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
Joined
43 posts • 729 comments
No, we did not. We are not restricting discussion (those are your words) because this is a life and death situation. We are requiring sources for life or death claims, and we are removing purely speculative and baseless assertions of fact, because this is a life and death situation.
No. I’m saying the risks of a contested convention turning sour are not what they were in 1968 when this happened.