Count042

It’s relevant because that is what you are using. It sure as hell isn’t logic or data.

'Improperly collected data failed us once, so it always will" is literally the same thing as what you are saying.

It ignores any changes in methodology that occurred in 8 years. It ignores identified biases that have been removed.

It’s literally am anti-science point of view.

E.g. your gut. It sure as hell isn’t coming from your brain.

Your response was irrelevant. It’s not even data. It’s a literal named fallacy.

“Trump won once, so he will again” is literally the same statement.

Take a critical thinking class, cause you really don’t know how.

Your gut is not data.

So… Let me get this right. Your only response is literally a named fallacy?

What does your gut say the stock market will do next month, oh wonderful and correct Oracle?

Four months before a presidential election. With the known American attention span.

You do realize that those two facts mean the opposite is what you imply in your comment, right?

Given that every point of data shows Trump winning in a landside, and probably getting the house and Senate, if Biden stays in suggests that people advocating for Biden staying in want Trump to win.

See what I did there?

Fun fact, actual data supports one and only one of us.

Are you a Russian bot that wants Trump to win?

Where do you live? 1600 Pennsylvania ave?

Literally every point of actual data disagrees with you.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Boss_(businessman)

Holy shit, you are conspiracy brained.

There is no coup. The DNC has been lying for years about how bad Biden is. Why do you think they worked to cancel the primary?

You know, that thing that would have had a debate that would have made it clear there was a problem here before the first presidential primary?

Those things exist for a reason.

By all accounts, the leaks from the phone call Biden had with the Moderate democratic house members was worse then the debate.