DahGangalang
Boy, if that title was any more loaded, I’d have to bake it and eat it with dinner.
In addition to the other comments, you’ll want to be sure you’re paying attention to FCC (or whatever the regulatory body is for your region) regulations.
This looks to be using standard size antennas, which says to me that it’s upping the power output. It’s my understanding that the FCC is super intense about enforcing maximum power output limits.
I’m not sure what you mean, but expanding on what I mean: the parts of the title that I feel carry strong bias are “non violent destruction of machinery” and “mass climate murder”. The obvious lean of the title says to me that I should expect no attempt to objectively report what’s happened; that this is just a post meant to enrage me (as a lefty, because she was arrested; as a righty because it shows support for a leftist).
I think this rage-bait posting acts solely as a call to violence and serves to prevent solution oriented discussions. I feel this is another of the myriad tools used by those in power to reduce unity among the masses and to distract from implementing real change.
So yeah, all that is to say: I hate this post title. Need you to pump the brakes on supporting the eco-terrorism. I probably support what you’re looking to accomplish, but disagree with the means by which you intend to accomplish it.
In interest of a complete record, the video I found most compelling on the issue:
I’d love for you to disprove this guy’s claims. I mean this in good faith and will be checking back in the next couple hours.
In interest of a complete record, the video I found most compelling on the issue:
I’d love for you to disprove this guy’s claims. I mean this in good faith and will be checking back in the next couple hours.
In interest of a complete record, the video I found most compelling on the issue:
I’d love for you to disprove this guy’s claims. I mean this in good faith and will be checking back in the next couple hours.
In interest of a complete record, the video I found most compelling on the issue:
I’d love for you to disprove this guy’s claims. I mean this in good faith and will be checking back in the next couple hours.
In interest of a complete record, the video I found most compelling on the issue:
I’d love for you to disprove this guy’s claims. I mean this in good faith and will be checking back in the next couple hours.
In interest of a complete record, the video I found most compelling on the issue:
I’d love for you to disprove this guy’s claims. I mean this in good faith and will be checking back in the next couple hours.