EatATaco

She’s definitely a boomer. Funny thing about this is that it’s Clint who isn’t a boomer.

Muh both sides is almost universally used to justify still considering Republicans despite how terrible the party has become.

They’re full of shit.

While I agree that people should vote like they don’t exist, the reality is that they do a good job of giving you an idea of where voters stand. They were historically accurate in 2022.

If you think “they’re full of shit” it’s almost certainly a problem of understanding rather than with the polls themselves. Considering you haven’t really made an argument as to why, I can’t know for sure.

The polls are literally telling you that it’s neck and neck right now. If this isn’t clear to you, the problem isn’t the polls.

I gotcha, I misunderstood

I know we were less likely to work on the same file concurrently.

I mean, isn’t that when merge conflicts happen? Isn’t that your answer?

Reluctantly, I gave the piece a fair shake.

It’s garbage. We know that the DNC pushed other more moderate candidates out so that a more moderate candidate, one the average democratic voter and independent thinks they want, could win instead of them all splitting the vote. This was obvious, not some conspiracy theory.

The author of the piece is trying to claim that because one person said they chose a candidate that could beat sanders, that was the ultimate goal. But they wanted to beat sanders because they felt he couldn’t beat trump. They quote one person effectively saying this, but then dishonestly spin it.

The second quote is one person saying that he thinks sanders policies are bad, as if this proves anything.

It’s amazing anyone reads this site without realizing how terrible it is.

Is there evidence that a human would have judged those cases differently?

It implies that a human would have been worse. Or at least that an average human would be worse, the ones making the decision.