FleetingTit

Unfortunately this is how many people think.

Personally I don’t drive a large car, don’t drive very fast, and try to use public transit as much as possible.

N

Occupants.

I don’t care what happens to anyone I hit, as long as I can walk away from rolling my SUV at 200kmh.

Tariffs + subsidies of our own + improvements of public transit/city planning

Buying chinese electric cars ain’t gonna help the environment.

American (and european) car makers can’t fill that market need due to higher labour costs and stricter environmental laws.

Also the fact that the chinese government heavily subsidizes electric auto makers skews the market in favour of the chinese manufacturers.

I’m proud of all of you! And I will join you in solidarity for today. Nay: for this week!

I would just argue that objects of the Person-type are mutable, because basically everything about them can change without modifying who they are. The only thing immutable about a person is any one Moment-type object in their past.

Edit: I found your comment to be an interesting take on the concept, thank you!

Wait wait wait… immutable means unchangeable! In your analogy this would mean if someone changes anything about them, like a name due to marriage or gender due to affirming care, they become a new object. And you can, but shouldn’t assign that new object the same UUID.

What is broken about copper? Bit ootl.

Religion is such a great thing […] you almost say […] let’s not be good what difference does it make