Flyswat

So you want to continue using the American spyware. I’d give the Chinese spyware a try, to even the ground.

Well, how are they gonna pay the lawyers?

Name ckecks out, I guess?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KOLMIUkHSE

I bet it can run Dhoom

Comments here are proof why we need such place.

It’s impossible talking about religion without being attacked.

For Northern Africa it’s Fourth day too (in Arabic)

She is Jewish

Paris is a hard no-no. The rest is fine.

I don’t have to read a religious text to know it’s not true

How can you give an opinion or hold a position on something you refuse to assess?

The issue with going to sources so entrenched in studying religious text is that they are already tainted by the need to keep the text alive

Here you are making assumptions about the sources maybe because of Christianity and Judaism. The sources like I said are the contemporary ones and there is no room for reinterpretation in the exegesis to twist it in a way or the other due to conflicts that arised later on.

No religion has ever offered verifiable proof of any supernatural claim

Same can be applied to atheism which is positing that God does not exist. I assume you hold that position. If so you are not consistent in your approach.

Should one not objectively scrutinize the claims of both sides before holding a position?