Wie kann sich diese Situation verändern? Die Antwort als Kurzfassung: durch das Fediverse.

Word

There just is no utopia possible if you enact right-wing politics.

I find it astonishing that in 2023, when renewables are more ubiquitous and far cheaper than nuclear, there are still people who would advocate for an technological and societal inferior solution.

I mean fusion. It is just like advocating for NG as a bridging solution, true in theory, but at least three decades to late.

I think the scalability, in production as well as in installation, is the biggest plus for pv. You can build 0.25 kW PV or 1 GW. Nuclear reactors that are not even in the construction phase are, in my opinion, a waste of money and resources that could be invested in building renewables.

Maybe spend some time reading about the actual market situation.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-12/global-energy-storage-market-to-grow-15-fold-by-2030-bnef#xj4y7vzkg

https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/12/23/global-solar-capacity-additions-hit-268-gw-in-2022-says-bnef/

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx

The first link about growing storage wasn’t enough? The storage problem is solved it’s just not necessary, at least not yet. Economics will kill nuclear anyway I am just showing why and how…

False. There is currently no technology which enables an economically viable solution for 100% renewable grids.

Do you have any proof of this other than your own conclusions? Because a lot of experts see this very differently.

It seems Denmark is doing fine at the moment, so I don’t really see your argument there.

By the way, the EU wants to develope hydrogen for long term storage.

If you want expensive, sure you can use nuclear.

https://www.lazard.com/research-insights/2023-levelized-cost-of-energyplus/

One cannot prove a negative. Can you prove that god does not exist? Typically the burden of proof lies with the one making any positive claims such as you are.

Of course it would be possible to proof that something isn’t economicly viable exept in this case, because it is.

Here is a model of an economicly viable stand-alone system.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352152X22007836

The link above was about how insanely expensive Nuclear is compared to, well, everything else.

A