You could ask that question, but the answer doesnt matter politically. Women, cis and trans, are on the same side in that if the genocide of the latter is plausible, the former is already pretty hard done by. A worsening of one position necessarily accompanies the other. Gaza does not work like this. Republicans are obviously the worse choice there too. You can argue about red lines and such, but thats not how realpolitik works. We get two options, nothing more or less, zero alternatives. The consensus necessary to change this is not possible in the current political climate. Denying support to the lesser evil on the basis of said evil when their opponent will do that same evil but more is not logical.

Tangentially relatee, there are those who sacrifice trans women for the sake of cis women. We call them terfs, and they’ve largely backed rightwing parties

So, your argumentation is sound. The problem is that demonology is not a tennable position. Not quite sure where you got the idea that consequentialism is the default either, but thats an aside

Truth is, no, I don’t care. Liberals and progressives arent a viable coalition, the Democratic party is cooked

Do you think Muslim Americans are the only ones who sat out over Gaza?

Yes, noone has ever prioritized their own safety or sacrificed for the sake of political gains: these are psychologically impossible positions

Theres a little thing called picking your battles

Oh believe you me, the voters will be

And that makes the rapist felon better?

Egg prices, Gaza, and she didnt have a dick

No. It is YOUR fault if YOU fall for propaganda. Its time to hold people accountable for their stupidity