IzzyScissor

‘Boss’ is a pretty good one for someone you’re trying to show respect to. ‘Buddy’ is good if you’re on an even field.

Something which, notably, happens on around 1% of all applications, but is prosecuted less than 0.000005% of the time.

From 2008 - 2012 there were 32 million background checks, and 373,900 rejections.

Between FY 2008 and FY 2015, an 8-year period, ATF formally referred 509 NICS denial
cases that included 558 subjects to USAOs for possible prosecution. The USAOs
accepted for consideration of prosecution 254 subjects (or less than 32 subjects per
year) and declined to prosecute 272 subjects.

32 prosecutions a year for an average of 6 million background checks (completed, there is a much larger number for bg checks initiated)

Do installs of the same game by the same user across multiple devices count as different installs?

We treat different devices as different installs. We don’t want to track identity across different devices.

Jesus Christ. A single user can freely install the game repeatedly and bankrupt a creator.

Now I can display the most visually appealing parts of my shoes! The soles!

In all seriousness, this would create a giant mess instantly. Imagine the mud stuck to the bottom of shoes just on display for anyone walking past.

They also say that ‘They do not want to track users across devices, so each device will count individually’. They say you can appeal large charges, but only if you can prove that it’s a botnet or bad-faith actors. If it looks like random data, the developers are stuck with the bill.

Imagine how much more chill everyone on the road would be if they were getting paid to be there.

Remember, if someone asks you if you verbally agreed to 24k, you say NO. You verbally agreed to 42k and have the paperwork to match. There is no discrepancy.

How is it that there isn’t a riot when killing an unarmed, innocent person who asked for your help is labeled “Failing to meet expectations”???

Bitch, that is murder. Your expectations cannot seriously be as low as ‘don’t kill people’, and still fail at that with no consequences.

I dunno, He seems pretty incapable of doing the work. I doubt he could even understand the job, considering he ‘won against Obama in 2016’ and ‘is worried about Biden causing world war II’

Or better yet - don’t interview him at all. Do an exposé piece on him that details everything and run it primarily in his district if you want to actually affect change.

The fact that he’s being interviewed only adds to his credibility, and no matter what happens here, people are going to think he’s just misunderstood, since “He’d be in jail if this were all true, right?”

He should be.