PapaStevesy

We don’t need context, the shit he is quoted as saying is objectively sexist, even ignoring the first sentence. He doesn’t just say he doesn’t want to play with women, he says he doesn’t want them playing at all. What context makes that not sexist?

I was referencing your interpretation of a direct quote, nothing hypothetical about any of it. Did you respond to wrong person? That’s ok, it happens. Regardless, I’m not sure what the “sarcasm” comment is referring to. Were you trying to say you were being sarcastic when you said he was sexist or when you said he wasn’t? Neither help justify your argument.

No, “I’m sexist” cannot be interpreted as “I’m not sexist.”

Repeatedly asking “Why would I lie?” really makes it seem like he’s lying, lol. I wouldn’t have even considered it if hadn’t brought it up.

So I have to start shopping there before I can boycott it? Sounds counterproductive.

…is also delicious and versatile!

Yeah, I know everyone knows they exist, that’s what “objective, observable reality” referred to. Reread the first part of my comment, that’s the part that directly relates to what you said.

Politics refers to the systems we create to form and guide the shape of society. Every aspect of existence in society is, by definition, political.

Even that’s woke, according to their definition.

“Straight”—sexuality = woke “White”—race = woke “Male”—gender = woke

I guess games just can’t have any characters in them at all anymore, in case one of them has a race or a gender that gets referenced.

The existence of queer and non-white people is not leftist, it’s objective, observable reality, free of political bias.