Polendri

I’ve thought the same about containers in general (plastic, glass, metal): standardize sizes and sell goods in reusable containers. Buy your Oreos in a standard reusable container same as any other cookie, eat em, bring it back to the store for a deposit. Companies will hate the reduced branding potential of a cardboard sleeve around a standardized container, but… tough.

I find it so tiresome hearing about how cyclists are supposedly more entitled than motorists (or the other way around, since cyclists say the same things about drivers).

Drivers routinely roll through stops, jockey for position, move erratically or dangerously, block crosswalks or bike lanes, distract themselves on their phones, get upset when mildly inconvenienced by having to underspeed behind a cyclist taking the lane for safety, etc.

1. Being entitled and breaking the law to get places faster is universal; I think uou’re just acclimated to drivers doing it.

2. The infrastructure is so car-oriented and bike-hostile that following the law often disadvantages cyclists or puts them at risk. That doesn’t justify, say, biking fast across a crosswalk, but sidewalk-riding on a 4-lane road without bike lanes? IMO it does.

3. There’s bias here in treating the worst cyclist behaviour as being something condoned by cyclists at large. Kind of like if someone said “drivers just want to drag race around town”.

It’s hard not to see this as ignorance given how easy it is to look up the great safety record of these laws (i.e. right there on the Wikipedia page).

The “Idaho stop” (red as stop, stop as yield for cyclists) is a thing in several jurisdictions, and research shows it is as safe or safer that way.

Still ought to follow the laws, but there’s reason to want those laws to be different.

I feel that about the Fediverse too, despite being highly technical. Picking a server involves trust (e.g. that they won’t go offline and take your account down with them), but you’re just exposed to a list of servers with no idea who runs them. Plus, the server name shows up in your handle, so it affects one’s public persona and people care about that.

I’m on Lemmy through lemmy.ca which feels like an authoritative “Lemmy for Canada”, but… it’s just some random individual person who snagged the domain name. They seem great but I have no assurance that something weird won’t happen with it later.

Sleep Powder is the only one IMO. 75% hit rate and an expected 2+ turns of effect means it’s a good gamble vs a stronger opponent, plus it’s practical for catching Pokemon.

Well, that and Gen 1 Toxic + Leech Seed is pretty fun…

The Straight gets over 300m deep in proposed crossing areas, and has hundreds more metres of sediment before hitting bedrock. That depth makes for unprecedented engineering challenges for both tunnels and bridge supports; not necessarily impossible but certainly not financially feasible. A floating bridge in a place with so much wind and waves is similarly unprecented and probably a non-starter due to the shipping traffic.

The BC government has a good overview page about it. They basically suggest that the only thing that has even the slightest chance of working is a submerged floating tunnel, something which has never been attempted.

0%: anywhere the payment happens before the service is provided, or for outright bad service

10%: for service that is just taking and serving an order, for mediocre full service, or for lesser service at a place I just really like and want to support

15%: for good “full” service (multiple orders, repeatedly checking in, etc)

That’s what I go by and it seems very fair to me.

Like the Toronto teacher who was wearing those gigantic prosthetic breasts, this seems like one of those things that at surface level sounds unjust to the employee (“what they do outside of work is their own busoness” etc), but when you know the details it becomes clear that the employee has been doing a number of things to justify firing and has just been trying to spin a story of persecution to the media.

Nothing inherently wrong IMO with a teacher doing porn so long as those two jobs are completely compartmentalized, but that’s also a very fine line, and I don’t get the impression (from the admittedly incomplete info of the news articles) that this person was doing that properly and in good faith.

Anyone know how a 4-category scale is different than letter grades? Not saying it isn’t, it just isn’t clear in the article.

Hopefully it’s a step toward having fewer grades at all. There’s a lot of research showing how harmful extrinsic rewards are to children’s motivation to learn.